Add mention of GCP trials #2596
Conversation
|
@shainaraskas Sidenote, wondering if we should update this header given that both ECH and Serverless are available GCP MP. |
🔍 Preview links for changed docs |
|
|
||
| Some differences exist when you subscribe to {{ecloud}} through the GCP Marketplace: | ||
|
|
||
| * There is no trial period. Billing starts when you subscribe to {{ecloud}}. | ||
| * Existing {{ecloud}} organizations cannot be converted to use the GCP Marketplace. | ||
| * New customers {{ecloud}} obtain a 7-day trial period. During this period, you can use a single deployment and three projects of {{ecloud}}. After this period, usage-based billing starts, unless you delete your cloud resources. | ||
| * Pricing for an {{ecloud}} subscription through the GCP Marketplace follows the pricing outlined on the [{{ecloud}}](https://console.cloud.google.com/marketplace/product/endpoints/elasticsearch-service.gcpmarketplace.elastic.co) page in the GCP Marketplace. Pricing is based the {{ecloud}} [Billing Dimensions](../../cloud-organization/billing/cloud-hosted-deployment-billing-dimensions.md). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this billing dimensions link valid for the serverless case?
definitely open to changing the front matter. should just do a quick read of the page to make sure that it's all appropriate for serverless.
- this item I mentioned
- the snapshot/restore case - we don't offer this for serverless. could edit this with a hint that this is for ECH deployments only.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You're right that we should link to https://www.elastic.co/docs/deploy-manage/cloud-organization/billing/serverless-project-billing-dimensions too.
Ideally we'd have a single page to send user to when we want to talk about "EC billing dimensions". It would be helpful not just for GCP MP, but most references to cloud billing, including other MPs.
++ on mentioning that snapshot/restore is ECH only.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we have this disambiguation section here that you could link to, but it also mentions specific serverless project dimensions: https://www.elastic.co/docs/deploy-manage/cloud-organization/billing#pricing-model
There was a problem hiding this comment.
++ good idea to use the subsection on that page!
I'm not sure how to add changes to another file to this PR, so I'll just describe it here:
I think that page would be even more effective if it was laid out this way, because of the ways eyes scan the page, and how hyperlinks stand out.
Each Elastic Cloud Serverless project type also has its own billing dimensions.
[Elastic Cloud Hosted deployments billing dimensions](https://www.elastic.co/docs/deploy-manage/cloud-organization/billing/cloud-hosted-deployment-billing-dimensions)
[Elastic Cloud Serverless billing dimensions](https://www.elastic.co/docs/deploy-manage/cloud-organization/billing/serverless-project-billing-dimensions)
[Elasticsearch projects billing dimensions](https://www.elastic.co/docs/deploy-manage/cloud-organization/billing/elasticsearch-billing-dimensions)
[Elastic Observability projects billing dimensions](https://www.elastic.co/docs/deploy-manage/cloud-organization/billing/elastic-observability-billing-dimensions)
[Elastic Security projects](https://www.elastic.co/docs/deploy-manage/cloud-organization/billing/security-billing-dimensions)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll pop this into a followup issue: #2610
deploy-manage/deploy/elastic-cloud/google-cloud-platform-marketplace.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sure. you could update it to:
|
…tplace.md Co-authored-by: Heran Gao <[email protected]>
Add header updates
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we're going to handle https://github.com/elastic/docs-content/pull/2596/files#r2282791653 in a separate issue, then I think this is probably good to go. I made the suggested change to the header, so as far as I can tell this is approved.
|
@briancurtin + @demers-eric the changes to elastic.co/docs/deploy-manage/cloud-organization/billing#pricing-model are going to be handled in a separate issue. the other suggestions in https://github.com/elastic/docs-content/pull/2596/files#r2279635052 still need to be addressed. |
@shainaraskas Just to confirm, we’ll need to wait for #2610 |
|
@HeranGa0 no - the anchor will remain the same. this pr is not blocked. |
|
@demers-eric are you still making changes to this PR? |
|
@shainaraskas updated with a change to the URL... something tells me I can't use an anchor link like that but will let you adjust it as needed, TIA |
|
@demers-eric I am not seeing the most recent change - did you push it yet? if not I can make a couple of small edits for you |
|
@shainaraskas yes please! I was just trying to change the URL to something like this:
|
|
I don't know what do to now! I've tried looking at https://elastic.github.io/docs-builder/contribute/on-the-web/ but it just says "make a pull request". |
|
@demers-eric hey eric, thanks for the nudge. I had set this to auto merge but the branch was out of date. I am just updating it using this button 
it should merge on its own in a few minutes. |
@HeranGa0 @briancurtin @stj please review, and comment on the PR when trials are enabled in GCP MP. Thanks!