@@ -954,6 +954,7 @@ service:
954954 configChan <- cfgChange
955955 coord .runLoopIteration (ctx )
956956 assert .True (t , cfgChange .acked , "empty policy should be acknowledged" )
957+ assert .NoError (t , cfgChange .err , "config processing shouldn't report an error" )
957958 assert .True (t , updated , "empty policy should cause runtime manager update" )
958959 assert .Empty (t , components , "empty policy should produce empty component model" )
959960 assert .True (t , otelUpdated , "empty policy should cause otel manager update" )
@@ -1070,6 +1071,7 @@ service:
10701071 configChan <- cfgChange
10711072 coord .runLoopIteration (ctx )
10721073 assert .True (t , cfgChange .acked , "Coordinator should ACK a successful policy change" )
1074+ assert .NoError (t , cfgChange .err , "config processing shouldn't report an error" )
10731075
10741076 // Make sure the runtime manager received the expected component update.
10751077 // An assert.Equal on the full component model doesn't play nice with
@@ -1134,6 +1136,7 @@ service:
11341136 configChan <- cfgChange
11351137 coord .runLoopIteration (ctx )
11361138 assert .True (t , cfgChange .acked , "Coordinator should ACK a successful policy change" )
1139+ assert .NoError (t , cfgChange .err , "config processing shouldn't report an error" )
11371140
11381141 // Make sure the runtime manager received the expected component update.
11391142 // An assert.Equal on the full component model doesn't play nice with
0 commit comments