Fix validation of subfields of flattened objects (#2088)

When a document doesn't has subobjects, like when using `subobjects: false or synthetic
mode, if an undocumented field is found, we need to check its ancestors to see if it is a
member of a flattened object.

Author: jsoriano

internal/fields/testdata/flattened.json

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
         "userName": "Bob",
         "groupName": "admin"
       }
-    }
+    },
+    "flattened.request_parameters.userID": 1000
   }
-}
+}

internal/fields/validate.go

@@ -681,6 +681,8 @@ func (v *Validator) validateScalarElement(key string, val any, doc common.MapStr
 		switch {
 		case skipValidationForField(key):
 			return nil // generic field, let's skip validation for now
+		case isFlattenedSubfield(key, v.Schema):
+			return nil // flattened subfield, it will be stored as member of the flattened ancestor.
 		case isArrayOfObjects(val):
 			return fmt.Errorf(`field %q is used as array of objects, expected explicit definition with type group or nested`, key)
 		case couldBeMultifield(key, v.Schema):
@@ -855,6 +857,22 @@ func isArrayOfObjects(val any) bool {
 	return false
 }
 
+func isFlattenedSubfield(key string, schema []FieldDefinition) bool {
+	for strings.Contains(key, ".") {
+		i := strings.LastIndex(key, ".")
+		key = key[:i]
+		ancestor := FindElementDefinition(key, schema)
+		if ancestor == nil {
+			continue
+		}
+		if ancestor.Type == "flattened" {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false
+}
+
 func findElementDefinitionForRoot(root, searchedKey string, fieldDefinitions []FieldDefinition) *FieldDefinition {
 	for _, def := range fieldDefinitions {
 		key := strings.TrimLeft(root+"."+def.Name, ".")