Skip to content

Commit a7f63a4

Browse files
committed
Reformat
1 parent d5527dd commit a7f63a4

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-5
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-5
lines changed

server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/transport/TransportHandshaker.java

Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -44,13 +44,13 @@ final class TransportHandshaker {
4444
* ignores the body of the request. After the handshake, the OutboundHandler uses the min(local,remote) protocol version for all later
4545
* messages.
4646
*
47-
* This version supports two handshake protocols, v7170099 and v8800000, which respectively have the same message structure
48-
* as the transport protocols of v7.17.0, and v8.18.0. This node only sends v8800000 requests, but it can send a valid response
49-
* to any v7170099 requests that it receives.
47+
* This version supports two handshake protocols, v7170099 and v8800000, which respectively have the same message structure as the
48+
* transport protocols of v7.17.0, and v8.18.0. This node only sends v8800000 requests, but it can send a valid response to any v7170099
49+
* requests that it receives.
5050
*
5151
* Note that these are not really TransportVersion constants as used elsewhere in ES, they're independent things that just happen to be
52-
* stored in the same location in the message header and which roughly match the same ID numbering scheme. Older versions of ES did
53-
* rely on them matching the real transport protocol (which itself matched the release version numbers), but these days that's no longer
52+
* stored in the same location in the message header and which roughly match the same ID numbering scheme. Older versions of ES did rely
53+
* on them matching the real transport protocol (which itself matched the release version numbers), but these days that's no longer
5454
* true.
5555
*
5656
* Here are some example messages, broken down to show their structure. See TransportHandshakerRawMessageTests for supporting tests.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)