Skip to content

Commit dc31392

Browse files
committed
More chars
1 parent 57e0750 commit dc31392

17 files changed

+24
-24
lines changed

docs/reference/aggregations/search-aggregations-bucket-composite-aggregation.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ PUT my-index-000001
606606
```
607607

608608
1. This index is sorted by `username` first then by `timestamp`.
609-
2. in ascending order for the `username` field and in descending order for the `timestamp` field.1. could be used to optimize these composite aggregations:
609+
2. in ascending order for the `username` field and in descending order for the `timestamp` field.1. could be used to optimize these composite aggregations:
610610

611611

612612

docs/reference/aggregations/search-aggregations-bucket-datehistogram-aggregation.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ Response:
679679
}
680680
```
681681

682-
The response will contain all the buckets having the relative day of the week as key : 1 for Monday, 2 for Tuesday… 7 for Sunday.
682+
The response will contain all the buckets having the relative day of the week as key : 1 for Monday, 2 for Tuesday… 7 for Sunday.
683683

684684

685685

docs/reference/aggregations/search-aggregations-bucket-significanttext-aggregation.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Re-analyzing *large* result sets will require a lot of time and memory. It is re
2121
* Suggesting "H5N1" when users search for "bird flu" to help expand queries
2222
* Suggesting keywords relating to stock symbol $ATI for use in an automated news classifier
2323

24-
In these cases the words being selected are not simply the most popular terms in results. The most popular words tend to be very boring (*and, of, the, we, I, they*). The significant words are the ones that have undergone a significant change in popularity measured between a *foreground* and *background* set. If the term "H5N1" only exists in 5 documents in a 10 million document index and yet is found in 4 of the 100 documents that make up a user’s search results that is significant and probably very relevant to their search. 5/10,000,000 vs 4/100 is a big swing in frequency.
24+
In these cases the words being selected are not simply the most popular terms in results. The most popular words tend to be very boring (*and, of, the, we, I, they* ). The significant words are the ones that have undergone a significant change in popularity measured between a *foreground* and *background* set. If the term "H5N1" only exists in 5 documents in a 10 million document index and yet is found in 4 of the 100 documents that make up a user’s search results that is significant and probably very relevant to their search. 5/10,000,000 vs 4/100 is a big swing in frequency.
2525

2626
## Basic use [_basic_use_2]
2727

docs/reference/aggregations/search-aggregations-bucket-terms-aggregation.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@ When aggregating on multiple indices the type of the aggregated field may not be
696696

697697
### Failed Trying to Format Bytes [_failed_trying_to_format_bytes]
698698

699-
When running a terms aggregation (or other aggregation, but in practice usually terms) over multiple indices, you may get an error that starts with "Failed trying to format bytes…". This is usually caused by two of the indices not having the same mapping type for the field being aggregated.
699+
When running a terms aggregation (or other aggregation, but in practice usually terms) over multiple indices, you may get an error that starts with "Failed trying to format bytes… ". This is usually caused by two of the indices not having the same mapping type for the field being aggregated.
700700

701701
**Use an explicit `value_type`** Although it’s best to correct the mappings, you can work around this issue if the field is unmapped in one of the indices. Setting the `value_type` parameter can resolve the issue by coercing the unmapped field into the correct type.
702702

docs/reference/aggregations/search-aggregations-metrics-weight-avg-aggregation.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ mapped_pages:
99

1010
A `single-value` metrics aggregation that computes the weighted average of numeric values that are extracted from the aggregated documents. These values can be extracted either from specific numeric fields in the documents.
1111

12-
When calculating a regular average, each datapoint has an equal "weight" … it contributes equally to the final value. Weighted averages, on the other hand, weight each datapoint differently. The amount that each datapoint contributes to the final value is extracted from the document.
12+
When calculating a regular average, each datapoint has an equal "weight" … it contributes equally to the final value. Weighted averages, on the other hand, weight each datapoint differently. The amount that each datapoint contributes to the final value is extracted from the document.
1313

1414
As a formula, a weighted average is the `∑(value * weight) / ∑(weight)`
1515

docs/reference/elasticsearch-plugins/integrations.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Integrations are not plugins, but are external tools or modules that make it eas
3131
* [Ingest processor template](https://github.com/spinscale/cookiecutter-elasticsearch-ingest-processor): A template for creating new ingest processors.
3232
* [Kafka Standalone Consumer (Indexer)](https://github.com/BigDataDevs/kafka-elasticsearch-consumer): Kafka Standalone Consumer [Indexer] will read messages from Kafka in batches, processes(as implemented) and bulk-indexes them into Elasticsearch. Flexible and scalable. More documentation in above GitHub repo’s Wiki.
3333
* [Scrutineer](https://github.com/Aconex/scrutineer): A high performance consistency checker to compare what you’ve indexed with your source of truth content (e.g. DB)
34-
* [FS Crawler](https://github.com/dadoonet/fscrawler): The File System (FS) crawler allows to index documents (PDF, Open Office…) from your local file system and over SSH. (by David Pilato)
34+
* [FS Crawler](https://github.com/dadoonet/fscrawler): The File System (FS) crawler allows to index documents (PDF, Open Office… ) from your local file system and over SSH. (by David Pilato)
3535
* [Elasticsearch Evolution](https://github.com/senacor/elasticsearch-evolution): A library to migrate elasticsearch mappings.
3636
* [PGSync](https://pgsync.com): A tool for syncing data from Postgres to Elasticsearch.
3737

docs/reference/elasticsearch/configuration-reference/networking-settings.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ The `transport.compress` setting always configures local cluster request compres
428428

429429
### Response compression [response-compression]
430430

431-
The compression settings do not configure compression for responses. {{es}} will compress a response if the inbound request was compressed—even when compression is not enabled. Similarly, {{es}} will not compress a response if the inbound request was uncompressed—even when compression is enabled. The compression scheme used to compress a response will be the same scheme the remote node used to compress the request.
431+
The compression settings do not configure compression for responses. {{es}} will compress a response if the inbound request was compressed— even when compression is not enabled. Similarly, {{es}} will not compress a response if the inbound request was uncompressed— even when compression is enabled. The compression scheme used to compress a response will be the same scheme the remote node used to compress the request.
432432

433433

434434

docs/reference/elasticsearch/index-settings/sorting-conjunctions.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ mapped_pages:
55

66
# Use index sorting to speed up conjunctions [index-modules-index-sorting-conjunctions]
77

8-
Index sorting can be useful in order to organize Lucene doc ids (not to be conflated with `_id`) in a way that makes conjunctions (a AND b AND …) more efficient. In order to be efficient, conjunctions rely on the fact that if any clause does not match, then the entire conjunction does not match. By using index sorting, we can put documents that do not match together, which will help skip efficiently over large ranges of doc IDs that do not match the conjunction.
8+
Index sorting can be useful in order to organize Lucene doc ids (not to be conflated with `_id`) in a way that makes conjunctions (a AND b AND … ) more efficient. In order to be efficient, conjunctions rely on the fact that if any clause does not match, then the entire conjunction does not match. By using index sorting, we can put documents that do not match together, which will help skip efficiently over large ranges of doc IDs that do not match the conjunction.
99

1010
This trick only works with low-cardinality fields. A rule of thumb is that you should sort first on fields that both have a low cardinality and are frequently used for filtering. The sort order (`asc` or `desc`) does not matter as we only care about putting values that would match the same clauses close to each other.
1111

docs/reference/elasticsearch/index-settings/sorting.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ PUT my-index-000001
3535
```
3636

3737
1. This index is sorted by the `date` field
38-
2. in descending order.
38+
2. in descending order.
3939

4040

4141
It is also possible to sort the index by more than one field:
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ PUT my-index-000001
6464
```
6565

6666
1. This index is sorted by `username` first then by `date`
67-
2. in ascending order for the `username` field and in descending order for the `date` field.
67+
2. in ascending order for the `username` field and in descending order for the `date` field.
6868

6969

7070
Index sorting supports the following settings:

docs/reference/elasticsearch/mapping-reference/parent-join.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ The only case where the join field makes sense is if your data contains a one-to
139139

140140
## Searching with parent-join [_searching_with_parent_join]
141141

142-
The parent-join creates one field to index the name of the relation within the document (`my_parent`, `my_child`, …).
142+
The parent-join creates one field to index the name of the relation within the document (`my_parent`, `my_child`, … ).
143143

144144
It also creates one field per parent/child relation. The name of this field is the name of the `join` field followed by `#` and the name of the parent in the relation. So for instance for the `my_parent`[`my_child`, `another_child`] relation, the `join` field creates an additional field named `my_join_field#my_parent`.
145145

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)