-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
[Entitlements] Fix Entitlement initialization to work across multiple versions #121192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
ldematte
merged 8 commits into
elastic:main
from
ldematte:entitlements/fix-multiple-version-checker-initialization-2
Feb 4, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1b3fc03
Fix Entitlement initialization to work across multiple versions
ldematte c146229
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into entitlements/fix-mu…
ldematte da21565
PR feedback: more comments, avoid visiting multiple times, use Class …
ldematte 7b6abbb
Merge branch 'main' into entitlements/fix-multiple-version-checker-in…
ldematte a9ee692
Merge branch 'main' into entitlements/fix-multiple-version-checker-in…
ldematte 3100728
Merge branch 'main' into entitlements/fix-multiple-version-checker-in…
ldematte ab86fb9
Merge branch 'main' into entitlements/fix-multiple-version-checker-in…
ldematte 00c31ed
Merge branch 'main' into entitlements/fix-multiple-version-checker-in…
ldematte File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need asm here? Since we have Class objects already, can't we use reflection to find all of the methods?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking the same, but every time we use reflection (e.g. in #120811 (comment)), we end up regretting it and go back to ASM; for example in the linked issue I tried to use reflection first, only to end up with NoClassDefFoundError errors in tests due to the fact that our interface uses types that may not (are not) always available (at least at this time).
It might be fine in this case if we use it only for finding the base classes, but since we need to use ASM to find all the methods anyway, why risk?