Skip to content

Conversation

@fcofdez
Copy link
Contributor

@fcofdez fcofdez commented Jan 31, 2025

This reverts commit ae0f1a6.

The refresh block would be removed in a subsequent cluster state update instead of removing it immediately after an index is ready for searches.

Closes ES-10697

…astic#120807)"

This reverts commit ae0f1a6.

The refresh block would be removed in a subsequent cluster state
update instead of removing it immediately after an index is ready
for searches.

Closes ES-10697
@fcofdez fcofdez added >non-issue :Distributed Indexing/Store Issues around managing unopened Lucene indices. If it touches Store.java, this is a likely label. Team:Distributed Indexing Meta label for Distributed Indexing team labels Jan 31, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed-indexing (Team:Distributed Indexing)

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the serverless-linked Added by automation, don't add manually label Jan 31, 2025
Copy link
Member

@tlrx tlrx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@fcofdez
Copy link
Contributor Author

fcofdez commented Feb 3, 2025

@elasticmachine update branch

@fcofdez fcofdez merged commit 30a706a into elastic:main Feb 4, 2025
17 checks passed
fzowl pushed a commit to voyage-ai/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
…astic#120807)" (elastic#121427)

This reverts commit ae0f1a6.

The refresh block would be removed in a subsequent cluster state
update instead of removing it immediately after an index is ready
for searches.

Closes ES-10697
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

:Distributed Indexing/Store Issues around managing unopened Lucene indices. If it touches Store.java, this is a likely label. >non-issue serverless-linked Added by automation, don't add manually Team:Distributed Indexing Meta label for Distributed Indexing team v9.1.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants