-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.7k
Fix synthetic source issue with deeply nested ignored source fields #121715
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
Pinging @elastic/es-storage-engine (Team:StorageEngine) |
Collaborator
|
Hi @lkts, I've created a changelog YAML for you. |
jordan-powers
approved these changes
Feb 4, 2025
Contributor
jordan-powers
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, LGTM
kkrik-es
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2025
lkts
added a commit
to lkts/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2025
…lastic#121715) * Fix synthetic source issue with deeply nested ignored source fields * Update docs/changelog/121715.yaml
This was referenced Feb 5, 2025
Collaborator
lkts
added a commit
to lkts/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2025
…lastic#121715) * Fix synthetic source issue with deeply nested ignored source fields * Update docs/changelog/121715.yaml
lkts
added a commit
to lkts/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2025
…lastic#121715) * Fix synthetic source issue with deeply nested ignored source fields * Update docs/changelog/121715.yaml
lkts
added a commit
to lkts/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2025
…lastic#121715) * Fix synthetic source issue with deeply nested ignored source fields * Update docs/changelog/121715.yaml
lkts
added a commit
to lkts/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2025
…lastic#121715) * Fix synthetic source issue with deeply nested ignored source fields * Update docs/changelog/121715.yaml
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-backport
Automatically create backport pull requests when merged
>bug
:StorageEngine/Mapping
The storage related side of mappings
Team:StorageEngine
v8.16.4
v8.17.2
v8.18.1
v8.19.0
v9.0.0
v9.1.0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an accidental discovery from new block loader tests.
Randomized tests will eventually catch this but it is rare. It requires:
The problem is that
ignoredValuesPresentsignals when any children have ignored values. Existingthis.ignoredValues != nullcheck is weaker and only signals when immediate children have ignored values. This causes an erroneous decision that there are no ignored values in the hierarchy.