Remove some copying and slow sorting from search shard resolution #123426
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Removed one unnecessary sort (the shards are already sorted in the same order) and ported two more to JDK's list sort which beats Lucene's timsort by quite a margin nowadays (the mutations are done straight on the array backing the list and that saves endless indirection). Also, removed a needless intermediary to and from set copy and an unnecessary conditional. This is all motivated by spacetime project benchmarking showing this stuff as one of the biggest contributors to search transport thread use.
original-brownbear
added
>non-issue
:Search Foundations/Search
|
Pinging @elastic/es-search-foundations (Team:Search Foundations) |
elasticsearchmachine
added
Team:Search Foundations
|
Thanks Chris! |
parkertimmins
pushed a commit
to parkertimmins/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2025
…astic#123426) Removed one unnecessary sort (the shards are already sorted in the same order) and ported two more to JDK's list sort which beats Lucene's timsort by quite a margin nowadays (the mutations are done straight on the array backing the list and that saves endless indirection). Also, removed a needless intermediary to and from set copy and an unnecessary conditional. This is all motivated by spacetime project benchmarking showing this stuff as one of the biggest contributors to search transport thread use.
ywangd
pushed a commit
to ywangd/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2025
…astic#123426) Removed one unnecessary sort (the shards are already sorted in the same order) and ported two more to JDK's list sort which beats Lucene's timsort by quite a margin nowadays (the mutations are done straight on the array backing the list and that saves endless indirection). Also, removed a needless intermediary to and from set copy and an unnecessary conditional. This is all motivated by spacetime project benchmarking showing this stuff as one of the biggest contributors to search transport thread use.
afoucret
pushed a commit
to afoucret/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2025
…astic#123426) Removed one unnecessary sort (the shards are already sorted in the same order) and ported two more to JDK's list sort which beats Lucene's timsort by quite a margin nowadays (the mutations are done straight on the array backing the list and that saves endless indirection). Also, removed a needless intermediary to and from set copy and an unnecessary conditional. This is all motivated by spacetime project benchmarking showing this stuff as one of the biggest contributors to search transport thread use.
jfreden
pushed a commit
to jfreden/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 12, 2025
…astic#123426) Removed one unnecessary sort (the shards are already sorted in the same order) and ported two more to JDK's list sort which beats Lucene's timsort by quite a margin nowadays (the mutations are done straight on the array backing the list and that saves endless indirection). Also, removed a needless intermediary to and from set copy and an unnecessary conditional. This is all motivated by spacetime project benchmarking showing this stuff as one of the biggest contributors to search transport thread use.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removed one unnecessary sort (the shards are already sorted in the same order) and ported two more to JDK's list sort which beats Lucene's timsort by quite a margin nowadays (the mutations are done straight on the array backing the list and that saves endless indirection). Also, removed a needless intermediary to and from set copy and an unnecessary conditional.
This is all motivated by spacetime project benchmarking showing this stuff as one of the biggest contributors to search transport thread use.