Skip to content

Conversation

@pquentin
Copy link
Member

This has been accepted since Elasticsearch 0.14.0 :) #540

@pquentin pquentin added >non-issue :Data Management/Indices APIs APIs to create and manage indices and templates auto-backport Automatically create backport pull requests when merged v8.18.1 v8.19.0 v9.0.1 v9.1.0 v8.17.5 labels Mar 19, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team label Mar 19, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-data-management (Team:Data Management)

Copy link
Contributor

@nielsbauman nielsbauman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These legacy templates are deprecated, but I guess adding this one param here doesn't hurt. Thanks, @pquentin!

@pquentin
Copy link
Member Author

Yes my thoughts exactly. We're doing this just to be able to replace rest-api-spec with the Elasticsearch specification.

@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Backport successful

Status Branch Result
8.18
8.x
9.0
8.17

pquentin added a commit to pquentin/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
pquentin added a commit to pquentin/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
pquentin added a commit to pquentin/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
smalyshev pushed a commit to smalyshev/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2025
omricohenn pushed a commit to omricohenn/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

auto-backport Automatically create backport pull requests when merged :Data Management/Indices APIs APIs to create and manage indices and templates >non-issue Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team v8.17.5 v8.18.1 v8.19.0 v9.0.1 v9.1.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants