From c0998bb552fb58b513cebebfc6a30162f747fc26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bogdan Pintea Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 17:28:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] SQL: Docs: Drop examples of LIKE/RLIKE vs QUERY/MATCH equivalence (#125673) This drops the examples of LIKE/RLIKE vs QUERY/MATCH equivalence. --- .../reference/query-languages/sql/sql-like-rlike-operators.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/reference/query-languages/sql/sql-like-rlike-operators.md b/docs/reference/query-languages/sql/sql-like-rlike-operators.md index 652e08f38c3ac..f03c702663d89 100644 --- a/docs/reference/query-languages/sql/sql-like-rlike-operators.md +++ b/docs/reference/query-languages/sql/sql-like-rlike-operators.md @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ Even though `RLIKE` is a valid option when searching or filtering in Elasticsear When using `LIKE`/`RLIKE`, do consider using [full-text search predicates](/reference/query-languages/sql/sql-functions-search.md) which are faster, much more powerful and offer the option of sorting by relevancy (results can be returned based on how well they matched). +