Skip to content

Conversation

@iverase
Copy link
Contributor

@iverase iverase commented Aug 27, 2025

Similar to #133640, fixing more polygons where holes are disjoint with the polygon.

@iverase iverase requested a review from craigtaverner August 27, 2025 18:01
@iverase iverase added >non-issue :Analytics/Geo Indexing, search aggregations of geo points and shapes v9.2.0 labels Aug 27, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine added the Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) label Aug 27, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics)

Copy link
Contributor

@craigtaverner craigtaverner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, although we could have left some of the valid holes, particularly in Tulsa.

@iverase iverase enabled auto-merge (squash) August 28, 2025 09:54
@iverase iverase disabled auto-merge August 28, 2025 09:54
@iverase iverase merged commit c5ae4ed into elastic:main Aug 28, 2025
32 of 33 checks passed
@iverase iverase deleted the moreGeoFix branch August 28, 2025 09:54
@iverase
Copy link
Contributor Author

iverase commented Aug 28, 2025

LGTM, although we could have left some of the valid holes, particularly in Tulsa.

I do think such complex polygons do not provide any value during testing and makes things more complicated to maintain.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

:Analytics/Geo Indexing, search aggregations of geo points and shapes >non-issue Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) v9.2.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants