Skip to content

crowdstrike: add event categorization fields to process data in alerts #15616

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

crowdstrike: add event categorization fields to process data in alerts #15616

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+82 −19

Conversation

navnit-elastic
Copy link
Contributor

@navnit-elastic navnit-elastic commented Oct 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Proposed commit message

crowdstrike: add event categorization fields to process data in alerts

Set event.category to "process" and event.type to "start" when
certain process fields are present in the alerts dataset.
Previously, alerts were being sent without setting
the event.category and event.type fields.

Checklist

  • I have reviewed tips for building integrations and this pull request is aligned with them.
  • I have verified that all data streams collect metrics or logs.
  • I have added an entry to my package's changelog.yml file.
  • I have verified that Kibana version constraints are current according to guidelines.
  • I have verified that any added dashboard complies with Kibana's Dashboard good practices

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Pipeline Tests:

--- Test results for package: crowdstrike - START ---
╭─────────────┬─────────────┬───────────┬───────────────────────────────────────────┬────────┬──────────────╮
│ PACKAGE     │ DATA STREAM │ TEST TYPE │ TEST NAME                                 │ RESULT │ TIME ELAPSED │
├─────────────┼─────────────┼───────────┼───────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼──────────────┤
│ crowdstrike │ alert       │ pipeline  │ (ingest pipeline warnings test-alert.log) │ PASS   │ 358.102002ms │
│ crowdstrike │ alert       │ pipeline  │ test-alert.log                            │ PASS   │  543.17555ms │
╰─────────────┴─────────────┴───────────┴───────────────────────────────────────────┴────────┴──────────────╯
--- Test results for package: crowdstrike - END   ---
Done

Related issues

Screenshots

@navnit-elastic navnit-elastic self-assigned this Oct 9, 2025
@navnit-elastic navnit-elastic added enhancement New feature or request Integration:crowdstrike CrowdStrike Team:Security-Service Integrations Security Service Integrations team [elastic/security-service-integrations] Team:Sit-Crest Crest developers on the Security Integrations team [elastic/sit-crest-contractors] labels Oct 9, 2025
@andrewkroh andrewkroh added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. Applied to PRs that modify *.md files. label Oct 9, 2025
@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod
Copy link

🚀 Benchmarks report

Package crowdstrike 👍(5) 💚(3) 💔(2)

Expand to view
Data stream Previous EPS New EPS Diff (%) Result
falcon 4405.29 3654.97 -750.32 (-17.03%) 💔
host 4566.21 3558.72 -1007.49 (-22.06%) 💔

To see the full report comment with /test benchmark fullreport

@elasticmachine
Copy link

💚 Build Succeeded

History

cc @navnit-elastic

@navnit-elastic navnit-elastic marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2025 08:45
@navnit-elastic navnit-elastic requested a review from a team as a code owner October 14, 2025 08:45
@elasticmachine
Copy link

Pinging @elastic/security-service-integrations (Team:Security-Service Integrations)

@navnit-elastic navnit-elastic mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2025
Open
tomsonpl
tomsonpl approved these changes Oct 14, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@tomsonpl tomsonpl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, this looks great!

@tomsonpl
Copy link
Contributor

@navnit-elastic hey, just wanted to check in and see when it's planned to be released? :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@tomsonpl tomsonpl tomsonpl approved these changes

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@navnit-elastic navnit-elastic

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. Applied to PRs that modify *.md files. enhancement New feature or request Integration:crowdstrike CrowdStrike Team:Security-Service Integrations Security Service Integrations team [elastic/security-service-integrations] Team:Sit-Crest Crest developers on the Security Integrations team [elastic/sit-crest-contractors]

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@navnit-elastic @elasticmachine @tomsonpl @andrewkroh