Skip to content

Conversation

@josevalim
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #373.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 71f2cdd8fd5a60c25b44caa4dfdc1813c6bc2618-PR-423

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-0.02%) to 92.275%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build d33d7452b20281cf7b1aaba299955e5c92719669: -0.02%
Covered Lines: 645
Relevant Lines: 699

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@maennchen maennchen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I no longer have access to a project that caused trouble. So I propose to just merge and see if there’s any issues.

Copy link
Contributor

@whatyouhide whatyouhide left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤞

@josevalim josevalim merged commit 30bf87d into main Nov 3, 2025
2 checks passed
@josevalim josevalim deleted the jv-fix-redefining branch November 3, 2025 08:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Duplicate references in POT files and warnings about redefining modules

5 participants