Improve the Eglot Experience

[jgarte]

Hi,

What do people think if we create a checklist on what should improve with eglot and rustic?

I realize that there are a lot of custom variables for configuring lsp-mode in rustic but I don't use lsp-mode and instead prefer the language server that is already built in to Emacs called Eglot.

[jgarte]

Has clippy been working fine for people with flymake enabled?

I don't use flycheck either for the same reasons.

[jgarte]

Another issue with lsp-mode versus eglot is that tramp does not work in the former, as described in the following blog post:

The lsp-mode docs refer to eglot as "[an] alternative minimal LSP implementation" and is indeed the LSP integration preferred by rustic-mode, but my choice was again constrained by tramp support: lsp-mode didn't work with tramp: "Unfortunately, lsp-mode doesn't seem to work with tramp. Hopefully somebody can fix this issue at some point. If you need to work with tramp the only option is eglot".

https://unwoundstack.com/blog/emacs-as-a-rust-ide.html

[Erk-]

I am not sure about that since I have previously used lsp-mode over tramp.
And they advertise support for it as well: https://emacs-lsp.github.io/lsp-mode/page/remote/

[jgarte]

Maybe this comment and issue should be closed then if you're certain it works as advertised? 🦆

brotzeit/rustic#361 (comment)