Package name style

[joshwlambert]

{ringbp} vs {ringbp}? I mildly prefer latter.

Originally posted by @pearsonca in #188 (review)

[joshwlambert]

Opening this issue to discuss peoples preferences for how to style package names consistently throughout the documentation. Couple of options and impacts of each:

• With versus without {}
• Italicised or not
• Monospaced or not
• Bold or not

---

• Tidyverse opinion on package name styling: https://style.tidyverse.org/documentation.html#package-names
• Some previous discussion on this topic in Epiverse: Check styling of package names for consistency epiverse-trace/blueprints#91
• Using \pkg{} in {roxygen2} renders it as bold
• {pkgdown} renders {pkgname} as a plain hyperlinked name.

I don't have a preference so if there is no clear choice from others I'll go with the preference in the first comment.