You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+3-1Lines changed: 3 additions & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -121,8 +121,10 @@ Below are some guidelines for the manual quality control of each sample, but kee
121
121
- % Duplications “not excessive”
122
122
5. Inspect [Genome Browser Tracks](https://github.com/epigen/genome_tracks/) using UCSC Genome Browser (online) or IGV (local)
123
123
- Compare all samples to the best, based on above's QC metrics.
124
-
- Check cell type / experiment-specific markers for accessibility as positive controls.
124
+
- Check cell type / experiment-specific markers or sex chromosome (`X`/`Y`) for accessibility as positive controls.
125
125
- Check e.g., developmental regions for accessibility as negative controls.
126
+
> [!IMPORTANT]
127
+
> Sometimes reads map to `Y` in females, because `X` and `Y` chromosomes both have [pseudoautosomal regions (PARs)](https://www.ensembl.org/info/genome/genebuild/human_PARS.html) that are common between the two chromosomes.
126
128
6.[Unsupervised Analysis](https://github.com/epigen/unsupervised_analysis) (e.g., PCA or UMAP)
127
129
- Identify outliers/drivers of variation, especially in the control samples and within replicates.
0 commit comments