update

Author: EvenSol

src/main/java/neqsim/thermo/component/ComponentEos.java

@@ -601,9 +601,9 @@ public void seta(double a) {
   }
 
   /**
-   * Override the OmegaA parameter used in {@link #calca()}. Once set, every call to
-   * {@code calca()} (including those triggered by {@code init()}) will use this value instead of
-   * the EOS class default. Use {@code Double.NaN} to revert to the EOS default.
+   * Override the OmegaA parameter used in {@link #calca()}. Once set, every call to {@code calca()}
+   * (including those triggered by {@code init()}) will use this value instead of the EOS class
+   * default. Use {@code Double.NaN} to revert to the EOS default.
    *
    * @param omegaA the OmegaA value, e.g. 0.45724 for PR or 0.42748 for SRK.
    */

src/test/java/neqsim/process/equipment/compressor/DryGasSealAnalyzerTest.java

@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@
  *
  * <p>
  * Validates all six sub-analyses using the Bacalhau GIC seal gas composition and conditions from
- * SOK7305593 (Flowserve API 692 datasheet). Expected results are cross-validated against
- * manual NeqSim TPflash/PHflash calculations performed during the original task.
+ * SOK7305593 (Flowserve API 692 datasheet). Expected results are cross-validated against manual
+ * NeqSim TPflash/PHflash calculations performed during the original task.
  * </p>
  *
  * @author neqsim

src/test/java/neqsim/thermo/system/SystemPrLeeKeslerEosTest.java

@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@
  * <li>Flash calculations converge and produce physically valid results (VF in [0,1], positive
  * density, positive pressure).</li>
  * <li>For light components (ω ≤ 0.49) PR-LK and PR78 give identical VF (same m-factor).</li>
- * <li>For mixtures containing heavy pseudo-components (ω > 0.49) PR-LK and PR78 differ
- * measurably, because PR-LK applies the PR76 m-factor to all components while PR78 uses a
- * modified polynomial for ω > 0.49.</li>
+ * <li>For mixtures containing heavy pseudo-components (ω > 0.49) PR-LK and PR78 differ measurably,
+ * because PR-LK applies the PR76 m-factor to all components while PR78 uses a modified polynomial
+ * for ω > 0.49.</li>
  * <li>Clone preserves model name.</li>
  * </ol>
  */
@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ public void testVfEqualsToPr78ForLightComponents() {
 
     // PR76 == PR78 for omega < 0.49 -> VF must agree within numerical precision
     assertEquals(vfPr78, vfLk, 1e-6,
-        "PR-LK and PR78 should give identical VF for light components; got LK="
-        + vfLk + " vs PR78=" + vfPr78);
+        "PR-LK and PR78 should give identical VF for light components; got LK=" + vfLk + " vs PR78="
+            + vfPr78);
   }
 
   @Test
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ public void testVfDifferentFromPr78ForHeavyComponents() {
 
     // PR76 != PR78 for heavy components -> VF must differ by more than numerical noise
     assertTrue(Math.abs(vfLk - vfPr78) > 1e-6,
-        "PR-LK and PR78 should give different VF for heavy components (omega>0.49); got LK="
-        + vfLk + " vs PR78=" + vfPr78);
+        "PR-LK and PR78 should give different VF for heavy components (omega>0.49); got LK=" + vfLk
+            + " vs PR78=" + vfPr78);
   }
 
   @Test