Add TSC meeting 01-May-2025 transcript (#583)

Co-authored-by: ESLint Bot <eslint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

Author: github-actions[bot]

notes/2025/2025-05-01-transcript.md

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+# 05/01/2025 ESLint TSC Meeting Transcript
+
+**nzakas:** Howdy!
+
+**fasttime:** Hi!
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Hi!
+
+**nzakas:** Just pulling up last TSC meeting notes
+
+**nzakas:** Looks like the only action item was to dedicate one day each week to reviewing team PRs. How did that go?
+
+**mdjermanovic:** It went fine with me, spent more than one day this week
+
+**fasttime:** For me it was more like every day 😅
+
+**nzakas:** Hehe. I actually check every day because I have time to do so. It was really more a minimum than a maximum, to give us all permission to focus for at least one day.
+
+**nzakas:** Let's do statuses. This past two weeks I've been working on CSSTree and doing some refactoring of `Linter` in preparation for the core rewrite (more PRs coming for that). Overall goal is to split out a lot of the functionality into easier-to-manage pieces and then figure out an API on top of it.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I was mostly reviewing PRs. Also fixed a bug with circular references in RuleTester. I plan to focus on RFCs in the coming days.
+
+**fasttime:** I was mostly busy reviewing PRs and issues.
+
+**nzakas:** RFC Duty:
+This week - @nzakas 
+May 5 - @mdjermanovic 
+May 12 - @fasttime
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** (Please double-check 😅 )
+
+**nzakas:** And availability for the next two weeks.
+
+My plan right now is for 3 hours each week day unless some freelance stuff pops up. I'll drop a note in Discord if that happens.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I think I'll be able to work 1.5-2 hours each day
+
+**fasttime:** I should be able to work 10-12 hours a week
+
+**nzakas:** Looks like no issues or PRs are flagged. Anything anyone wants to discuss?
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Nothing in particular from my side for today
+
+**fasttime:** Also nothing in particular from me
+
+**nzakas:** I've got a few things to quickly go over.
+
+**nzakas:** https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/19462
+
+**nzakas:** Specifically this comment: https://github.com/eslint/eslint/issues/19462#issuecomment-2794319204
+
+**nzakas:** If you can please think about and comment on this after the meeting, I'd appreciate it.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** Other things is I'd like to get both of your RFCs approved soon. I think the `basePath` one is probably the only thing holding up a v10 (which I think we should do soon), and the concurrency one seems ready to move into a prototype to me.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I'll focus on the `basePath` RFC from the next week
+ * 👍 @nzakas, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** Please also comment on the concurrency one
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Yes, I'll also review the concurrency one
+
+**fasttime:** I could work on a prototype for the multithread linting but I'd appreciate some comments about the open questions.
+ * 👍 @nzakas, @mdjermanovic
+
+**nzakas:** Okay, let's do contributor pool
+
+**nzakas:** Lots of contributions in April
+
+**nzakas:** https://github.com/issues?q=org%3Aeslint%20label%3A%22contributor%20pool%22%20merged%3A2025-04-01..2025-04-30%20
+
+**nzakas:** lumirlumir had 9: https://github.com/issues?q=org%3Aeslint%20label%3A%22contributor%20pool%22%20merged%3A2025-04-01..2025-04-30%20author%3Alumirlumir
+
+**nzakas:** So $1000 for all of them?
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** For some reason GitHub won't filter on anyone else's name...
+
+**nzakas:** sethamus has five PRs
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Yeah, weird, I've just tried sethamus
+
+**nzakas:** xbinaryx had three PRs
+
+**fasttime:** I just open the text search in the browser and it's highlighting the names
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+
+**nzakas:** Yeah that's what I'm doing too
+
+**nzakas:** Very annoying
+
+**nzakas:** Here's the list without lumirlumir: https://github.com/issues?q=org%3Aeslint%20label%3A%22contributor%20pool%22%20merged%3A2025-04-01..2025-04-30%20-author%3Alumirlumir
+
+**nzakas:** For xbinaryx $300? The changes were fairly small.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** Okay, sethamus had a PR that he later reverted, so really that's three PRs.
+
+**nzakas:** Er no, that wasn't his PR he reverted
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I think that wasn't their PR
+
+**mdjermanovic:** And it wasn't a clean revert, it retained the new feature while fixing the regression
+
+**nzakas:** Shall we say $500?
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**mdjermanovic:** So it was very helpful
+
+**nzakas:** aryaemami59 $250? https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/19401
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** The rest all seem like $100 to me
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** Fairly small PRs
+
+**nzakas:** Okay, I'll let them know.
+
+**nzakas:** Let's talk about the release
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I won't be available for the release this time
+
+**fasttime:** I can do the release tomorrow
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+ * 🙏 @nzakas
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Thanks!
+
+**fasttime:** It will be only eslint/js and eslint/eslint I think.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I think the same
+
+**fasttime:** Are there any PRs we should try to get merged until then?
+
+**nzakas:** Maybe this? https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/19648
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I'll review tomorrow morning
+ * 👍 @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** And this? https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/19670
+
+**mdjermanovic:** I'll review that one as well
+ * 👍 @fasttime
+
+**nzakas:** Thanks!
+
+**nzakas:** Nothing else looks pressing to me
+
+**mdjermanovic:** This one needs a second review: https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/19640
+ * 👍 @nzakas
+
+**fasttime:** I can review it tomorrow.
+ * 👍 @mdjermanovic
+
+**nzakas:** Okay, anything else before we end the meeting?
+
+**fasttime:** Nothing else from my side.
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Nothing in particular from my side
+
+**nzakas:** All right, then that's it for today. Thanks everyone! (And thanks @sam3k_ for the notes)
+
+**mdjermanovic:** Thanks! 👋
+
+**fasttime:** Thanks! Bye...