Skip to content

Commit 9f22c88

Browse files
github-actions[bot]ESLint Bot
andauthored
Add TSC meeting 03-April-2025 transcript (#577)
Co-authored-by: ESLint Bot <eslint[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
1 parent 7af0767 commit 9f22c88

File tree

1 file changed

+157
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+157
-0
lines changed

notes/2025/2025-04-03-transcript.md

Lines changed: 157 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
1+
# 04/03/2025 ESLint TSC Meeting Transcript
2+
3+
**nzakas:** Howdy! Just need a minute. Running from another meeting.
4+
5+
**mdjermanovic:** Hi!
6+
7+
**fasttime:** Hi 👋
8+
9+
**nzakas:** Okay, here we go.
10+
11+
**nzakas:** Pulling up the notes from last meeting
12+
13+
**nzakas:** Only action item was for me to start the CSSTree fork, which I did. I also reached out to the maintainer of CSSTree to discuss potentially working together.
14+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
15+
16+
**nzakas:** Let's do statuses next. I updated `defineConfig()` to look for `flat/` configs, updated `@eslint/create-config` to use `defineConfig()`, and did a bunch of work around types for the CSS and JSON plugins.
17+
18+
**mdjermanovic:** I have been working on the `basePath` RFC
19+
20+
**fasttime:** I've been mostly busy reviewing PRs and working on types.
21+
22+
**nzakas:** RFC Duty schedule:
23+
This week - @mdjermanovic
24+
March 10 - @fasttime
25+
March 17 - @nzakas
26+
27+
**mdjermanovic:** This week was @fasttime ?
28+
* 👍 @fasttime
29+
30+
**nzakas:** Hmm, according to the notes:
31+
32+
**nzakas:** >
33+
> This week (Feb 17) - @fasttime
34+
> Feb 24 - @nzakas
35+
> Mar 3 - @mdjermanovic
36+
37+
**nzakas:** Oh shoot, wrong notes 🤦‍♂️
38+
39+
**mdjermanovic:** Those are maybe old notes, this is from the last:
40+
March 17 - @nzakas
41+
Mar 24 - @mdjermanovic
42+
Mar 31 - @fasttime
43+
44+
**nzakas:** Yes, thanks.
45+
46+
**nzakas:** Okay, so next up would be:
47+
This week - @fasttime
48+
April 7 - @nzakas
49+
April 14 - @mdjermanovic
50+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
51+
52+
**nzakas:** Okay, let's discuss availability. For the next couple of weeks I'll only have one hour each weekday.
53+
54+
**mdjermanovic:** I'll probably still be at around 70-80% of my usual availability
55+
56+
**nzakas:** @mdjermanovic what's that roughly in hours?
57+
58+
**mdjermanovic:** around 1.5 hours per day
59+
* 👍 @nzakas
60+
61+
**fasttime:** For me 7-9 hours per week this and next week, will have a little more time by the end of the month.
62+
* 👍 @nzakas
63+
64+
**nzakas:** Okay, it looks like we don't have any issues or PRs tagged for today. Any topics anyone would like to discuss?
65+
66+
**fasttime:** Nothing from my side in particular.
67+
68+
**mdjermanovic:** Nothing in particular for today
69+
70+
**nzakas:** One thing I want to bring up: @fasttime there are some new comments on the concurrent linting RFC. Do you think you can take a look?
71+
72+
**fasttime:** Yes, I'll have a look during the weekend.
73+
* 👍 @nzakas
74+
75+
**nzakas:** Otherwise just a couple of reminders:
76+
77+
1. Please be sure to check in on Discord each day at least once.
78+
2. Please check for issues where eslint-tsc has been mentioned
79+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic
80+
81+
**nzakas:** and 3. Please be sure you're moving issues/PRs through the triage board columns 😄
82+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic
83+
84+
**fasttime:** Thanks 🤦‍♂️
85+
86+
**nzakas:** Let's do Contributor Pool
87+
88+
**nzakas:** Ooh, new UI on this page: https://github.com/issues?q=org%3Aeslint%20label%3A%22contributor%20pool%22%20merged%3A2025-03-01..2025-03-31%20
89+
90+
**nzakas:** We had a lot of submissions last month.
91+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
92+
93+
**mdjermanovic:** rviscomi also had several code contributions in `@eslint/css` but looks like neither was labeled: https://github.com/issues?q=org%3Aeslint+author%3Arviscomi+merged%3A2025-03-01..2025-03-31
94+
95+
**nzakas:** Yes, he let me know that he doesn't wish to participate.
96+
97+
**mdjermanovic:** Ah, okay then. didn't know
98+
99+
**nzakas:** Let's start with the big one: bulk suppressions from softius. I'd suggest $2,000 for all the RFC and implementation work.
100+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
101+
102+
**nzakas:** Pixel998 had a few PRs. The biggest being the switch to Cypress. @fasttime you're more familiar with that work. What's your recommendation?
103+
104+
**fasttime:** That PR took two attempts, not counting my unsuccessful ones, so maybe at least $200?
105+
106+
**mdjermanovic:** And maybe another $100 for the `./` patterns work, so $300 in total?
107+
108+
**fasttime:** Yeah, the other PRs seem related
109+
110+
**fasttime:** Then maybe $300 is okay?
111+
112+
**nzakas:** Okay, $300 it is.
113+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
114+
115+
**nzakas:** xbinaryx had four PRs
116+
117+
**nzakas:** All four website-related stuff. So $400?
118+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
119+
120+
**nzakas:** mrmckeb had two smalls PRs, so $150?
121+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
122+
123+
**nzakas:** fisker - $100?
124+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
125+
126+
**nzakas:** ryo-manba - $100?
127+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
128+
129+
**nzakas:** sethamus - $100?
130+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic
131+
132+
**nzakas:** azat-io implemented an entire rule, so $300?
133+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic, @fasttime
134+
135+
**nzakas:** I think that's everyone?
136+
137+
**mdjermanovic:** Yes, I also think the list is complete
138+
* 👍 @nzakas
139+
140+
**nzakas:** Okay, let's talk about the release.
141+
142+
**mdjermanovic:** I can tomorrow
143+
* 🙏 @nzakas
144+
145+
**fasttime:** Thanks!
146+
147+
**nzakas:** We'll have the suppressions blog post to publish too. I added a note on the release issue.
148+
* 👍 @mdjermanovic
149+
150+
**mdjermanovic:** That would be only `eslint` and `@eslint/js` this time I believe
151+
* 👍 @nzakas, @fasttime
152+
153+
**nzakas:** Okay, if there's nothing else, I think we can call it a meeting. Thanks everyone (and thanks @sam3k_ for the notes).
154+
155+
**mdjermanovic:** Thanks!
156+
157+
**fasttime:** Thanks! Bye 👋

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)