Terminology proposal: introduce OTIP (Over-The-IP) as a broader term encompassing OTA #3218
Unanswered
Velnius
asked this question in
Documentation
Replies: 1 comment
-
I see your point. But OTA update is common usage these days in the embedded device industry (in which I work) and it is generally taken as read that it covers wired as well as wireless networks. After all, most wired networks use Ethernet which travels over copper wire or optical fibre rather than the luminiferous æther but we don't get confused about that. :-) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Describe the improvement
Hi ESPHome team 👋
While working on an ESP32-POE-ISO-WROVER device as a Bluetooth Proxy, I noticed something conceptually unclear — both in the docs and in common usage — about the term "OTA" (Over-The-Air).
Technically, "OTA" implies wireless transmission (typically over Wi-Fi). However, ESPHome supports firmware updates over Ethernet, which is not "over the air" — it's just over IP.
So the term "OTA" becomes slightly misleading in modern use cases where:
💡 Proposal
Introduce or acknowledge a broader conceptual term:
OTIP — Over-The-IP
This would represent all firmware updates done over a TCP/IP network (regardless of the physical transport). Then:
This parallels physics concepts where:
✅ Benefits
🙏 I'm not suggesting renaming YAML keys, APIs, or breaking anything.
Just offering this as a potential improvement to the documentation and general terminology. It could help distinguish between "OTA over Wi-Fi" and "OTIP over Ethernet" in educational materials or FAQs.
Thanks for reading! Would love to hear your thoughts.
– Velnius
Anything else?
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions