Bug while calling Puck.getBatteryPercentage() in firmware v2.07 (Puck.js v2) #3521
Replies: 3 comments
-
Posted at 2020-10-07 by @gfwilliams I just booted up a fresh 2v07 Puck.js and uploaded:
via the Web IDE, to RAM, and I get:
So at least in a basic way it seems to be working. However it seems if I do I'll get a fix in for this now - I'm planning a 2v08 release this week so hopefully it'll be in that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Posted at 2020-10-07 by @gfwilliams Ok, cutting edge builds should now have a fix for this in, and it'll be in 2v08 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Posted at 2020-10-07 by ofeastaien Hi Gordon, Always nice to hear from you. :) Best regards |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Posted at 2020-10-07 by ofeastaien
Hi all,
I have experienced the bug while calling Puck.getBatteryPercentage() and NRF.getBattery() in firmware v2.07, the values were 0 and -3.6, respectively. It is OK while I downgrade to v2.06. These wrong values existed only if I send my code (for my own server and service) to RAM (using Web IDE). I've tested two Puck.js devices I have. Just report the issue for the reference. Thank you all my lovely Espruino team.
Best regards
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions