Skip to content

Conversation

@maurelian
Copy link
Contributor

@maurelian maurelian commented Jan 22, 2025

This updates the foundry version to use the v0.3.0 tag corresponding to the last stable release.

The commit is tagged with ci-builder/v0.57.0.

@maurelian maurelian requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2025 18:54
@maurelian maurelian requested a review from mslipper January 22, 2025 18:54
@maurelian maurelian marked this pull request as draft January 22, 2025 19:03
@maurelian maurelian force-pushed the stable-foundry-version branch from 03c62d8 to f353191 Compare January 22, 2025 19:06
@maurelian maurelian marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2025 19:08
Copy link
Contributor Author

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.69%. Comparing base (ef6ef6f) to head (f353191).
Report is 8 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop   #13926       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage    46.80%   77.69%   +30.89%     
============================================
  Files          973      166      -807     
  Lines        81123     9459    -71664     
  Branches       776      776               
============================================
- Hits         37968     7349    -30619     
+ Misses       40244     1890    -38354     
+ Partials      2911      220     -2691     
Flag Coverage Δ
cannon-go-tests-32 62.26% <ø> (ø)
cannon-go-tests-64 57.35% <ø> (ø)
contracts-bedrock-tests 88.51% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 807 files with indirect coverage changes

@Inphi
Copy link
Contributor

Inphi commented Jan 22, 2025

The 0.3.0 release is older than what's used currently. Foundry was updated in #13711, though I can't figure out why. @smartcontracts is it OK to use an older foundry version here?

@maurelian maurelian added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 9a7257e Jan 23, 2025
47 checks passed
@maurelian maurelian deleted the stable-foundry-version branch January 23, 2025 01:28
samlaf pushed a commit to Layr-Labs/optimism that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
QuentinI pushed a commit to EspressoSystems/optimism-espresso-integration that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants