Skip to content

Commit 2aeddf2

Browse files
committed
remove trailing whitespaces
1 parent 7095e14 commit 2aeddf2

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-5
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-5
lines changed

tests/core/pyspec/eth2spec/test/eip7594/unittests/polynomial_commitments/test_polynomial_commitments.py

Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ def test_fft(spec):
2020
# then we apply an FFT to get evaluations over the roots of unity
2121
# we then apply an inverse FFT to the evaluations to get coefficients
2222

23-
# we check two things:
23+
# we check two things:
2424
# 1) the original coefficients and the resulting coefficients match
2525
# 2) the evaluations that we got are the same as if we would have evaluated individually
2626

@@ -42,19 +42,19 @@ def test_fft(spec):
4242
# second check: result of FFT are really the evaluations
4343
for i, w in enumerate(roots_of_unity):
4444
individual_evaluation = spec.evaluate_polynomialcoeff(poly_coeff, w)
45-
assert individual_evaluation == poly_eval[i]
45+
assert individual_evaluation == poly_eval[i]
4646

4747

4848
@with_eip7594_and_later
4949
@spec_test
5050
@single_phase
5151
def test_coset_fft(spec):
52-
52+
5353
# in this test we sample a random polynomial in coefficient form
5454
# then we apply a Coset FFT to get evaluations over the coset of the roots of unity
5555
# we then apply an inverse Coset FFT to the evaluations to get coefficients
5656

57-
# we check two things:
57+
# we check two things:
5858
# 1) the original coefficients and the resulting coefficients match
5959
# 2) the evaluations that we got are the same as if we would have evaluated individually
6060

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ def test_coset_fft(spec):
8181
# the element of the coset is coset_shift * w
8282
shifted_w = spec.BLSFieldElement((coset_shift * int(w)) % BLS_MODULUS)
8383
individual_evaluation = spec.evaluate_polynomialcoeff(poly_coeff, shifted_w)
84-
assert individual_evaluation == poly_eval[i]
84+
assert individual_evaluation == poly_eval[i]
8585

8686

8787
@with_eip7594_and_later

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)