Merge pull request #11697 from Vid201/dev

Fix: wrong word in strong statelessness section

Author: wackerow

public/content/roadmap/statelessness/index.md

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Weak statelessness is in an advanced state of research, but it relies upon propo
 
 ### Strong statelessness {#strong-statelessness}
 
-Strong statelessness removes the need for any blocks to store state data. Instead, transactions are sent with witnesses that can be aggregated by block producers. The block producers are then responsible for storing only that state that are needed for generating witnesses for relevant accounts. The responsibility for state is almost entirely moved to users, as they send witnesses and 'access lists' to declare which accounts and storage keys they are interacting with. This would enable extremely lightweight nodes, but there are tradeoffs including making it more difficult to transact with smart contracts.
+Strong statelessness removes the need for any node to store state data. Instead, transactions are sent with witnesses that can be aggregated by block producers. The block producers are then responsible for storing only that state that are needed for generating witnesses for relevant accounts. The responsibility for state is almost entirely moved to users, as they send witnesses and 'access lists' to declare which accounts and storage keys they are interacting with. This would enable extremely lightweight nodes, but there are tradeoffs including making it more difficult to transact with smart contracts.
 
 Strong statelessness has been investigated by researchers but is not currently expected to be part of Ethereum's roadmap - it is more likely that weak statelessness is sufficient for Ethereum's scaling needs.