You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: public/content/governance/index.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ Forks are when major technical upgrades or changes need to be made to the networ
121
121
122
122
The DAO fork was in response to the [2016 DAO attack](https://www.coindesk.com/understanding-dao-hack-journalists) where an insecure [DAO](/glossary/#dao) contract was drained of over 3.6 million ETH in a hack. The fork moved the funds from the faulty contract to a new contract allowing anyone who lost funds in the hack to recover them.
123
123
124
-
This course of action was voted on by the Ethereum community. Any ETH holder was able to vote via a transaction on [a voting platform](http://v1.carbonvote.com/). The decision to fork reached over 85% of the votes.
124
+
This course of action was voted on by the Ethereum community. Any ETH holder was able to vote via a transaction on [a voting platform](https://web.archive.org/web/20170620030820/http://v1.carbonvote.com/). The decision to fork reached over 85% of the votes.
125
125
126
126
It's important to note that whilst the protocol did fork to revert the hack, the weight the vote carried in deciding to fork is debatable for a few reasons:
0 commit comments