|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: ERC-223 Token Standard |
| 3 | +description: An overview of the ERC-223 fungible token standard, how it works, and a comparison to ERC-20. |
| 4 | +lang: en |
| 5 | +--- |
1 | 6 |
|
| 7 | +## Introduction {#introduction} |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +**What is ERC-223?** |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +The ERC-223 is another standard for fungible tokens, like the ERC-20. The key difference is that ERC-223 defines not only the token API, but also the logic of how tokens should be transferred from sender to recipient and introduces a communication model that allows token transfers to be handled on the recipients side. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +**How is it different from ERC-20 and why we need another token standard?** |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +ERC-223 addresses some limitations of ERC-20 and introduces a new method of interactions between token contract and a contract that may receive the tokens. There are few things that are possible with ERC-223 but not with ERC-20: |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +- Token transfer handling on the recipient's side. Recipient can detect that an ERC-223 token is being deposited. |
| 18 | +- Rejection of improperly sent tokens. If a user sent ERC-223 tokens to a contract that is not supposed to receive tokens then the contract can reject the transaction and the tokens will not be lost. |
| 19 | +- The transfer of ERC-223 tokens may contain metadata, which allows arbitrary information to be attached to the token transactions. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +## Prerequisites {#prerequisites} |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +- [Accounts](/developers/docs/accounts) |
| 24 | +- [Smart Contracts](/developers/docs/smart-contracts/) |
| 25 | +- [Token standards](/developers/docs/standards/tokens/) |
| 26 | +- [ERC-20](/developers/docs/standards/tokens/erc-20/) |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +## Body {#body} |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +The ERC-223 (Ethereum Request for Comments 223), proposed by Dexaran in March 2017, is a token standard that |
| 31 | +implements an API for tokens within smart contracts and declares API for a contract that is supposed to receive ERC-223 tokens. Any contract that does not support ERC-223 Receiver API can not receive ERC-223 tokens which prevents the most common user mistakes. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +If a smart contract implements the following methods and events it can be called an ERC-223 compatible token contract. Once deployed, it |
| 34 | +will be responsible to keep track of the created tokens on Ethereum. |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +The contract is not obligated to have only these functions and a developer can add any other feature from different token standards to this contract. For example, `approve` and `transferFrom` functions are not part of ERC-223 standard but these functions could be implemented should it be necessary. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +From [EIP-223](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-223): |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +#### Methods {#methods} |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +ERC-223 token must implement the following methods: |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +```solidity |
| 45 | +function name() public view returns (string) |
| 46 | +function symbol() public view returns (string) |
| 47 | +function decimals() public view returns (uint8) |
| 48 | +function totalSupply() public view returns (uint256) |
| 49 | +function balanceOf(address _owner) public view returns (uint256 balance) |
| 50 | +function transfer(address _to, uint256 _value) public returns (bool success) |
| 51 | +function transfer(address _to, uint256 _value, bytes calldata _data) public returns (bool success) |
| 52 | +``` |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +A contract that is supposed to receive ERC-223 tokens must implement the following method: |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +```solidity |
| 57 | +function tokenReceived(address _from, uint _value, bytes calldata _data) |
| 58 | +``` |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +If ERC-223 tokens are sent to a contract that doesn't implement the `tokenReceived(..)` function then the transfer must fail and the tokens must not be moved from the sender's balance. |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +#### Events {#events} |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +```solidity |
| 65 | +event Transfer(address indexed _from, address indexed _to, uint256 _value, bytes calldata _data) |
| 66 | +``` |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +### Examples {#examples} |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +The API of ERC-223 token is similar to that of ERC-20, so from UI development point of view there is no difference. The only exception here is that ERC-223 tokens may not have `approve` + `transferFrom` functions as these are optional for this standard. |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +### Solidity examples {#solidity-example} |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +The purpose of this example is to illustrate how a contract must work with ERC-223 tokens. |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +Assume that we have a very basic ERC-223 token: |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +```solidity |
| 79 | +pragma solidity ^0.8.19; |
| 80 | +abstract contract IERC223Recipient { |
| 81 | + function tokenReceived(address _from, uint _value, bytes memory _data) public virtual; |
| 82 | +} |
| 83 | +contract VeryBasicERC223Token { |
| 84 | + event Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint value, bytes data); |
| 85 | + string private _name; |
| 86 | + string private _symbol; |
| 87 | + uint8 private _decimals; |
| 88 | + uint256 private _totalSupply; |
| 89 | + mapping(address => uint256) private balances; |
| 90 | + function name() public view returns (string memory) { return _name; } |
| 91 | + function symbol() public view returns (string memory) {return _symbol; } |
| 92 | + function decimals() public view returns (uint8) { return _decimals; } |
| 93 | + function totalSupply() public view returns (uint256) { return _totalSupply; } |
| 94 | + function balanceOf(address _owner) public view returns (uint256) { return balances[_owner]; } |
| 95 | + function isContract(address account) internal view returns (bool) { |
| 96 | + uint256 size; |
| 97 | + assembly { size := extcodesize(account) } |
| 98 | + return size > 0; |
| 99 | + } |
| 100 | + function transfer(address _to, uint _value, bytes calldata _data) public returns (bool success){ |
| 101 | + balances[msg.sender] = balances[msg.sender] - _value; |
| 102 | + balances[_to] = balances[_to] + _value; |
| 103 | + if(isContract(_to)) { |
| 104 | + IERC223Recipient(_to).tokenReceived(msg.sender, _value, _data); |
| 105 | + } |
| 106 | + emit Transfer(msg.sender, _to, _value, _data); |
| 107 | + return true; |
| 108 | + } |
| 109 | + function transfer(address _to, uint _value) public returns (bool success){ |
| 110 | + bytes memory _empty = hex"00000000"; |
| 111 | + balances[msg.sender] = balances[msg.sender] - _value; |
| 112 | + balances[_to] = balances[_to] + _value; |
| 113 | + if(isContract(_to)) { |
| 114 | + IERC223Recipient(_to).tokenReceived(msg.sender, _value, _empty); |
| 115 | + } |
| 116 | + emit Transfer(msg.sender, _to, _value, _empty); |
| 117 | + return true; |
| 118 | + } |
| 119 | +} |
| 120 | +``` |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +Now we want another contract to accept deposits of `tokenA` assuming that tokenA is an ERC-223 token. The contract must accept only tokenA and reject any other tokens. When the contract receives tokenA it must emit a `Deposit()` event and increase the value of the internal `deposits` variable. |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +Here is the code: |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +```solidity |
| 127 | +contract RecipientContract is IERC223Recipient { |
| 128 | + event Deposit(address whoSentTheTokens); |
| 129 | + uint256 deposits = 0; |
| 130 | + address tokenA; // The only token that we want to accept. |
| 131 | + function tokenReceived(address _from, uint _value, bytes memory _data) public override |
| 132 | + { |
| 133 | + // It is important to understand that within this function |
| 134 | + // msg.sender is the address of a token that is being received, |
| 135 | + // msg.value is always 0 as the token contract does not own or send Ether in most cases, |
| 136 | + // _from is the sender of the token transfer, |
| 137 | + // _value is the amount of tokens that was deposited. |
| 138 | + require(msg.sender == tokenA); |
| 139 | + deposits += _value; |
| 140 | + emit Deposit(_from); |
| 141 | + } |
| 142 | +} |
| 143 | +``` |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +## Frequently asked questions {#faq} |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +### What will happen if we send some tokenB to the contract? {#sending-tokens} |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +The transaction will fail and the transfer of tokens will simply not happen. The tokens will be returned to the sender's address. |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +### How can we make a deposit to this contract? {#contract-deposits} |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +We can simply call the `transfer(address,uint256)` or `transfer(address,uint256,bytes)` function of the ERC-223 token and tell it to transfer some tokens to the address of the `RecipientContract`. That's it. |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +### What will happen if we transfer an ERC-20 token to this contract? {#erc-20-transfers} |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +The ERC-20 standard supports two methods of transferring tokens: `transfer` function and `approve + transferFrom` pattern. This is not possible to make a deposit with `transferFrom` function as the `RecipientContract` does not have any functions that subsequently call `transferFrom`. If an ERC-20 token is sent with `transfer` function to the address of the `RecipientContract` then unfortunately the tokens will be transferred from the sender's address to the address of the `RecipientContract` but the transfer will not be recognized i.e. `Deposit()` event will not be fired and `deposits` value will not change. There is also no way to filter or prevent unwanted ERC-20 deposits that are made with the `transfer` function. |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | +### What if we want to execute some function after the token deposit is completed? {#function-execution} |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +There are multiple ways of doing so. In this example we will follow the method which makes ERC-223 transfers identical to Ether transfers: |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +```solidity |
| 164 | +contract RecipientContract is IERC223Recipient { |
| 165 | + event Foo(); |
| 166 | + event Bar(uint256 someNumber); |
| 167 | + address tokenA; // The only token that we want to accept. |
| 168 | + function tokenReceived(address _from, uint _value, bytes memory _data) public override |
| 169 | + { |
| 170 | + require(msg.sender == tokenA); |
| 171 | + address(this).call(_data); // Handle incoming transaction and perform a subsequent function call. |
| 172 | + } |
| 173 | + function foo() public |
| 174 | + { |
| 175 | + emit Foo(); |
| 176 | + } |
| 177 | + function bar(uint256 _someNumber) public |
| 178 | + { |
| 179 | + emit Bar(_someNumber); |
| 180 | + } |
| 181 | +} |
| 182 | +``` |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +When the `RecipientContract` will receive a ERC-223 token the contract will execute a function encoded as `_data` parameter of the token transaction, identical to how Ether transactions encode function calls as transaction `data`. Read [the data field](https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/transactions/#the-data-field) for more information. |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +In the above example an ERC-223 token must be transferred to the address of the `RecipientContract` with the `transfer(address,uin256,bytes calldata _data)` function. If the data parameter will be `0xc2985578` (the signature of a `foo()` function) then the function foo() will be invoked after the token deposit is received and the event Foo() will be fired. |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +Parameters can be encoded in the `data` of the token transfer as well, for example we can call the bar() function with 12345 value for `_someNumber`. In this case the `data` must be `0x0423a13200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004d2` where `0x0423a132` is the signature of the `bar(uint256)` function and `00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004d2` is 12345 as uint256. |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +## Further reading {#further-reading} |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | +- [EIP-223: ERC-223 Token Standard](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-223) |
| 193 | +- [Initial ERC-223 proposal](https://github.com/ethereum/eips/issues/223) |
0 commit comments