You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: src/content/developers/tutorials/reverse-engineering-a-contract/index.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ If the call data size is four bytes or more this might be a valid ABI call.
274
274
| 10 | PUSH1 0xe0 | 0xE0 (((First word (256 bits) of the call data))) |
275
275
| 12 | SHR | (((first 32 bits (4 bytes) of the call data))) |
276
276
277
-
Etherscan tells us that `1C` is an unknown opcode, because [it was added after Etherscan wrote this feature](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-145) and they haven't updated it. An [up to data opcode table](https://github.com/wolflo/evm-opcodes) shows us that this is shift right
277
+
Etherscan tells us that `1C` is an unknown opcode, because [it was added after Etherscan wrote this feature](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-145) and they haven't updated it. An [up to date opcode table](https://github.com/wolflo/evm-opcodes) shows us that this is shift right
0 commit comments