Fix typo

Spelling correction

Author: bskrksyp9

src/content/developers/docs/scaling/sidechains/index.md

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ While bridges help users move funds between Ethereum and the sidechain, the asse
 
 | Pros                                                                                                                        | Cons                                                                                                             |
 | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
-| The technology underpinning sidechains is well-established and benefits from extensive research and improvements in design. | Sidechains trade off some measure of decentralization and trustlesness for scalability.                          |
+| The technology underpinning sidechains is well-established and benefits from extensive research and improvements in design. | Sidechains trade off some measure of decentralization and trustlessness for scalability.                          |
 | Sidechains support general computation and offer EVM compatibility (they can run Ethereum-native dapps).                    | A sidechain uses a separate consensus mechanism and doesn't benefit from Ethereum's security guarantees.         |
 | Sidechains use different consensus models to efficiently process transactions and lower transaction fees for users.         | Sidechains require higher trust assumptions (e.g., a quorum of malicious sidechain validators can commit fraud). |
 | EVM-compatible sidechains allow dapps to expand their ecosystem.                                                            |                                                                                                                  |