DAO hack reference contract Etherscan -> Blockscout

Co-Authored-By: Austin Griffith <[email protected]>

Author: wackerow

public/content/history/index.md

@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ The Tangerine Whistle fork was the first response to the denial of service (DoS)
 
 #### Summary {#dao-fork-summary}
 
-The DAO fork was in response to the [2016 DAO attack](https://www.coindesk.com/learn/understanding-the-dao-attack/) where an insecure [DAO](/glossary/#dao) contract was drained of over 3.6 million ETH in a hack. The fork moved the funds from the faulty contract to a [new contract](https://etherscan.io/address/0xbf4ed7b27f1d666546e30d74d50d173d20bca754) with a single function: withdraw. Anyone who lost funds could withdraw 1 ETH for every 100 DAO tokens in their wallets.
+The DAO fork was in response to the [2016 DAO attack](https://www.coindesk.com/learn/understanding-the-dao-attack/) where an insecure [DAO](/glossary/#dao) contract was drained of over 3.6 million ETH in a hack. The fork moved the funds from the faulty contract to a [new contract](https://eth.blockscout.com/address/0xbf4ed7b27f1d666546e30d74d50d173d20bca754) with a single function: withdraw. Anyone who lost funds could withdraw 1 ETH for every 100 DAO tokens in their wallets.
 
 This course of action was voted on by the Ethereum community. Any ETH holder was able to vote via a transaction on [a voting platform](https://web.archive.org/web/20170620030820/http://v1.carbonvote.com/). The decision to fork reached over 85% of the votes.