Skip to content

Commit e75d7d5

Browse files
paolo-de-rosadavid-bakkernikosft
authored
Review/topic b final document (#403)
* Solving #895 * Solved #892 * Feature/topic b final document (#909) * Adding HLRs in Discussion Paper Topic B * Fixing last open discussion point in Topic B paper * Update b-re-issuance-and-batch-issuance-of-pids-and-attestations.md * Fixed comments by Eric and Paolo --------- Co-authored-by: Paolo De Rosa <paolo.de.rosa@linux.com Co-authored-by: David Bakker <75264147+david-bakker@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Nikos Fotiou <nikosft@gmail.com>
1 parent b5cd83a commit e75d7d5

File tree

2 files changed

+165
-148
lines changed

2 files changed

+165
-148
lines changed

docs/discussion-topics/a-privacy-risks-and-mitigations.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ To the maximum extent possible, Wallet Providers, PID Providers, and
857857
Attestation Providers SHALL:
858858
- ensure that Users do not notice which of the methods referenced in requirement 3
859859
is used for their PIDs, attestations, or WUAs,
860-
- ensure that no User action is needed for the re-issuance of new attestations.
860+
- ensure that no User action is needed for the re-issuance of PIDs or attestations.
861861

862862
>Note: The topic of re-issuance will be further discussed with Member
863863
States in Topic B.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)