Skip to content

apparatus entry with <del>, <add>, <subst> #152

@AnninaGili

Description

@AnninaGili

When the apparatus contains the elements <del> and <add>, their content is not showed correctly in EVT 2 apparatus. For examples, given the apparatus

<app>
                        <lem wit="#R #K #Y #T #Q #I #O #S #E #N #H #M #L #P #D">et</lem>
                        <rdg wit="#A">
                            <add>et</add>
                        </rdg>
                    </app>accessiones<app>
                        <lem wit="#R #K #Y #T #Q #I #O #S #N #H #A #L #D #E #M"/>
                        <rdg wit="#P">
                            <del>autem</del>
                        </rdg>
                    </app>

EVT 2 shows what can be seen in the attached screen: the reader cannot understand that A has added et, nor that P has written autem and then deleted it. Moreover, it is not correct to say that the other manuscripts have omitted something: their reading is the correct one.
What I would like to obtain in the apparatus, is the following:
a) when cliking on b], "et post add. A", or on c] "autem post del. P", without reference to the omission of the other codex
b) another possibility would be to connect the text to what preceds in the following way:
rubori ] et post add. A
accessiones ] autem post del. P

The same issue occurs when <del> and <add> are inside the element <subst>, as in the following case, again visible in the screen attached:

totum corpus<app>
                        <lem wit="#R #Y #I #S #N #M #A #L #P #D">pertinet rubori</lem>
                        <rdg wit="#E">pertinet ruboris</rdg>
                        <rdg wit="#O"><subst>
                                <del>pertinet ruboris</del>
                                <add>pertinet rubori</add>
                            </subst></rdg>
                        <rdg wit="#Q #T">pertinent rubori</rdg>
                        <rdg wit="#K">rubori pertinet</rdg>
                    </app>

In this case, what I would like to obtain would be:

pertinet rubori ] pertinet ruboris in pertinet rubori corr. O

Many thanks for you help!
Anna Gili
issuesETV

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions