Minimal amount of training samples for new NER model #10752
dave-espinosa
started this conversation in
Help: Best practices
Replies: 1 comment
-
The number of examples required for a model are a guideline, so the exact numbers aren't really the important thing. Basically if you find performance isn't good, the first thing you should focus on is more data. Catastrophic forgetting isn't inherent to NER, it's only an issue if you try to re-train a model with different data. You can avoid it by just training a model from scratch or using all your data. I suspect many people never encounter it at all. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello everyone,
Using this flowchart for my project, it seems I must "Train a new model from scratch", using
ner.manual
(please take my word for granted, there is no need in digging in details 😁). However and if my understanding of that flowchart is correct:Additionally, no recommendation regarding Catastrophic Forgetting is included in that flowchart, why? (PS.: I know there are already some posts in this forum, just curious as why such best practice has not been included there).
Thank you!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions