Why do some entities perform better than others? #11531
Unanswered
venti07
asked this question in
Help: Model Advice
Replies: 1 comment
-
Debugging models is pretty hard (see #3052), and there aren't really general reasons that non-BERT models would be better; it depends a lot on the details. Can you give examples of the entities you're training on, both the ones that do better with BERT and without? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have trained different entities within a NER task. Among others, I used spaCY Tok2Vec, Stanford NER and BERT for this purpose.
The results show that BERT models perform best on average. However, certain entities (3/9) perform better on spaCy and Stanford NER. I am now looking for general reasons why spaCy and Stanford give better results than BERT. It would be nice if a few can give their thoughts on this.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions