Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Fable.Pyxpecto is probably more interesting that Fable.Mocha now days as this works for JavaScript, .NET and Python. Regarding, adding test documentation we could add a mention of the different framework but the documentation on how to use them or configure them will be left to each project. There are just too many set up possible. Fable documentation aims to document Fable usage mainly not the full ecosystem. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
could be nice to add some testing docs on main fable website, also when using vite/vitest for example
unit testing (jest/vitest - ok but doc are a bit lacking)
integration testing (multiple component together, usually mocked dom - jsdom/happydom)
e2e testing with headless browser (vitest browser mode / playwright / webdriver.io etc)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions