You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tested RaBitQ and RaBitQfs on Intel machine, here are the results:
IVF16384_HNSW32,RaBitQ
cno=-1 key= perf=0.0000 t=0.000
cno=0 key=nprobe=1,quantizer_efSearch=4 perf=0.3312 t=0.109
for 1 bit, RaBitQfs is slower than RaBitQ, similar for 4 bit and 8 bit. Is RaBitQfs supposed to be faster than RaBitQ? Did I miss some configs? Thanks.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I tested RaBitQ and RaBitQfs on Intel machine, here are the results:
IVF16384_HNSW32,RaBitQ
cno=-1 key= perf=0.0000 t=0.000
cno=0 key=nprobe=1,quantizer_efSearch=4 perf=0.3312 t=0.109
IVF16384_HNSW32,RaBitQfs results:
cno=-1 key= perf=0.0000 t=0.000
cno=0 key=nprobe=1,quantizer_efSearch=4 perf=0.3328 t=0.498
for 1 bit, RaBitQfs is slower than RaBitQ, similar for 4 bit and 8 bit. Is RaBitQfs supposed to be faster than RaBitQ? Did I miss some configs? Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions