$ npm run lint

> [email protected] lint
> biome check --apply-unsafe --no-errors-on-unmatched --files-ignore-unknown=true ./

internalError/fs  DEPRECATED  ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ⚠ The argument --apply-unsafe is deprecated, it will be removed in the next major release. Use --write --unsafe instead.

$ npm run lint

> [email protected] lint
> biome check --apply-unsafe --no-errors-on-unmatched --files-ignore-unknown=true ./

internalError/fs  DEPRECATED  ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ⚠ The argument --apply-unsafe is deprecated, it will be removed in the next major release. Use --write --unsafe instead.
  

./src/client/core/CancelablePromise.ts:87:10 lint/suspicious/noThenProperty ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Do not add then to a class.
  
    85 │   }
    86 │ 
  > 87 │   public then<TResult1 = T, TResult2 = never>(
       │          ^^^^
    88 │     onFulfilled?: ((value: T) => TResult1 | PromiseLike<TResult1>) | null,
    89 │     onRejected?: ((reason: unknown) => TResult2 | PromiseLike<TResult2>) | null,
  

./src/client/sdk.gen.ts:51:8 lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Avoid classes that contain only static members.
  
     49 │ } from "./types.gen"
     50 │ 
   > 51 │ export class ItemsService {
        │        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   > 52 │   /**
         ...
  > 169 │   }
  > 170 │ }
        │ ^
    171 │ 
    172 │ export class LoginService {
  
  ℹ Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
  

./src/client/sdk.gen.ts:172:8 lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Avoid classes that contain only static members.
  
    170 │ }
    171 │ 
  > 172 │ export class LoginService {
        │        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  > 173 │   /**
         ...
  > 274 │   }
  > 275 │ }
        │ ^
    276 │ 
    277 │ export class PrivateService {
  
  ℹ Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
  

./src/client/sdk.gen.ts:277:8 lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Avoid classes that contain only static members.
  
    275 │ }
    276 │ 
  > 277 │ export class PrivateService {
        │        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  > 278 │   /**
         ...
  > 298 │   }
  > 299 │ }
        │ ^
    300 │ 
    301 │ export class UsersService {
  
  ℹ Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
  

./src/client/sdk.gen.ts:301:8 lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Avoid classes that contain only static members.
  
    299 │ }
    300 │ 
  > 301 │ export class UsersService {
        │        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  > 302 │   /**
         ...
  > 511 │   }
  > 512 │ }
        │ ^
    513 │ 
    514 │ export class UtilsService {
  
  ℹ Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
  

./src/client/sdk.gen.ts:514:8 lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Avoid classes that contain only static members.
  
    512 │ }
    513 │ 
  > 514 │ export class UtilsService {
        │        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  > 515 │   /**
         ...
  > 547 │     })
  > 548 │   }
  > 549 │ }
        │ ^
    550 │ 
  
  ℹ Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
  

./src/client/core/request.ts:60:7 lint/complexity/noForEach ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
  
    58 │       append(key, value.toISOString())
    59 │     } else if (Array.isArray(value)) {
  > 60 │       value.forEach((v) => encodePair(key, v))
       │       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    61 │     } else if (typeof value === "object") {
    62 │       Object.entries(value).forEach(([k, v]) => encodePair(`${key}[${k}]`, v))
  
  ℹ forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
  

./src/client/core/request.ts:62:7 lint/complexity/noForEach ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
  
    60 │       value.forEach((v) => encodePair(key, v))
    61 │     } else if (typeof value === "object") {
  > 62 │       Object.entries(value).forEach(([k, v]) => encodePair(`${key}[${k}]`, v))
       │       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    63 │     } else {
    64 │       append(key, value)
  
  ℹ forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
  

./src/client/core/request.ts:68:3 lint/complexity/noForEach ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
  
    66 │   }
    67 │ 
  > 68 │   Object.entries(params).forEach(([key, value]) => encodePair(key, value))
       │   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    69 │ 
    70 │   return qs.length ? `?${qs.join("&")}` : ""
  
  ℹ forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
  

./src/client/core/request.ts:79:25 lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
  
    77 │     .replace("{api-version}", config.VERSION)
    78 │     .replace(/{(.*?)}/g, (substring: string, group: string) => {
  > 79 │       if (options.path?.hasOwnProperty(group)) {
       │                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    80 │         return encoder(String(options.path[group]))
    81 │       }
  
  ℹ It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
  
  ℹ See MDN web docs for more details.
  

./src/client/core/request.ts:103:5 lint/complexity/noForEach ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
  
    101 │     }
    102 │ 
  > 103 │     Object.entries(options.formData)
        │     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  > 104 │       .filter(([, value]) => value !== undefined && value !== null)
         ...
  > 110 │         }
  > 111 │       })
        │       ^^
    112 │ 
    113 │     return formData
  
  ℹ forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
  

./src/client/core/request.ts:107:11 lint/complexity/noForEach ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Prefer for...of instead of forEach.
  
    105 │       .forEach(([key, value]) => {
    106 │         if (Array.isArray(value)) {
  > 107 │           value.forEach((v) => process(key, v))
        │           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    108 │         } else {
    109 │           process(key, value)
  
  ℹ forEach may lead to performance issues when working with large arrays. When combined with functions like filter or map, this causes multiple iterations over the same type.
  

./src/client/core/request.ts:153:9 lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Avoid the use of spread (`...`) syntax on accumulators.
  
    151 │     .reduce(
    152 │       (headers, [key, value]) => ({
  > 153 │         ...headers,
        │         ^^^^^^^^^^
    154 │         [key]: String(value),
    155 │       }),
  
  ℹ Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in `.reduce`) because it causes a time complexity of `O(n^2)`.
  
  ℹ Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
  

Checked 81 files in 106ms. No fixes applied.
Found 13 errors.
check ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

  ✖ Some errors were emitted while running checks.