Samba module should have separate client and server install profiles

[sctweedie]

f27 samba module currently has only the "default" profile; we should provide easy installation of either the client or server components.

[sgallagher]

We probably need the following profiles:

• SMB File-Sharing Client - smbclient and friends
• SMB File-Sharing Server - smbd and friends
• Domain Client - This might be winbind from samba or metapackages that pulls in SSSD's AD support. TBD.
• Domain Controller

[alexxa]

@sctweedie , @sgallagher In the latest Boltron-f27 I see all profiles mentioned in the previous comment, except Domain Controller:

Boltron-27-af42c9fea72e-0# dnf module info samba
Last metadata expiration check: 5:04:08 ago on Tue 31 Oct 2017 09:14:17 AM UTC.

Name             : samba
Stream           : master (default)
Version          : 20171024112243
Profiles         : client default domainclient server
Default profiles : default
Repo             : fedora-modular-server
Summary          : samba module
Description      : This samba module has been generated.
Artifacts        : avahi-0:0.7-5.module_8789fd86.x86_64
....

So will that be added or not?

[sgallagher]

@alexxa It's definitely missing but could be put there quite easily if we want to (all the packages are available). It would basically be adding this to the profiles:

    profiles:
        domaincontroller:
            description: Windows Domain Controller
            rpms:
                - libldb
                - libtdb
                - samba
                - samba-common
                - samba-common-libs
                - samba-common-tools
                - samba-dc
                - samba-libs

I can add and push that unless anyone disagrees. @sctweedie, @whitel , @KarstenHopp ?

[sgallagher]

@contyk and @sctweedie agreed on IRC that we should incorporate this, so I'm adding and building it now.

[james-antill]

This is done.

[alexxa]

@james-antill next time don't close it till we have a good build with this profile and it's listed in the image, please

[KarstenHopp]

@alexxa I think this can be closed now, right ?