Skip to content

Commit 1519e82

Browse files
committed
vttclean is now merged into unwanted_tables
(fonttools/fontbakery#4976)
1 parent 834a1d6 commit 1519e82

File tree

2 files changed

+0
-12
lines changed

2 files changed

+0
-12
lines changed

fontspector-py/tests/test_checks_hinting.py

Lines changed: 0 additions & 11 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -58,14 +58,3 @@ def test_check_smart_dropout(check):
5858

5959
ttFont["prep"].program.bytecode = array.array("B", [0])
6060
assert_results_contain(check(ttFont), FAIL, "lacks-smart-dropout")
61-
62-
63-
@pytest.mark.skip(reason="This check is not yet implemented.")
64-
@check_id("vttclean")
65-
def test_check_vttclean(check):
66-
"""There must not be VTT Talk sources in the font."""
67-
good_font = TEST_FILE("mada/Mada-Regular.ttf")
68-
assert_PASS(check(good_font))
69-
70-
bad_font = TEST_FILE("hinting/Roboto-VF.ttf")
71-
assert_results_contain(check(bad_font), FAIL, "has-vtt-sources")

profile-universal/src/lib.rs

Lines changed: 0 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -176,7 +176,6 @@ include_profiles = ["opentype"]
176176
# "family/single_directory", # Fontspector assumes families are in a directory
177177
# "ots", # ots checks need to be directly integrated
178178
# "ttx_roundtrip", # What's ttx? :-)
179-
# "vttclean", # merged into unwanted_tables
180179
# "fontspector_version", # we'll just do this once at the start of the program, doesn't make sense for web
181180
# "kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences", # I just think this is a bad check
182181
# "unique_glyphnames", # valid_glyphnames also checks for uniqueness

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)