Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
Good idea. Licensing of dependencies is complicated. As far as I can tell this doesn't need to be in our LICENSE file, but some other notice (eg described in https://ospo.co/blog/practice-tip-licenses-dependencies-and-notice-files/ ). So, we will add such a notice in docs, README.md, etc. We only use or build the FFT component of DUCC, which seems to be more permissive than "GPLv2 or later", namely, we can choose a 3-clause BSD license. @mreineck can correct us. Let's get a little input from the other devs. I'm moving this to an Issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I can confirm that all |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The code in this repo is (mostly) under the Apache 2.0 license
HOWEVER:
Not clearly documenting these facts may be a bit misleading to users, who might carelessly assume that finufft is entirely Apache 2.0, whereas, depending on the configuration, it "carries" one of several copyleft licenses with it.
I think this information should be more prominently displayed in the docs and readme.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions