-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Refactor api #27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor api #27
Conversation
- Moved SendGrid base URL to config. - Updated HttpClient base URL usage.
- Extracted helper function - Reduced code duplication - Improved error handling - Enhanced readability - Simplified accessors
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @fulleni, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on refactoring the application's configuration and API client setup. My aim was to improve code readability, reduce duplication, and enhance maintainability, particularly in how environment variables are accessed and how the SendGrid API client is initialized.
Highlights
- Environment Variable Handling Refactor: I've introduced a new private helper method
_getRequiredEnv
inEnvironmentConfig
to centralize the logic for retrieving mandatory environment variables. This significantly reduces boilerplate code and improves consistency across various environment variable getters likedatabaseUrl
,jwtSecretKey
,sendGridApiKey
,defaultSenderEmail
, andotpTemplateId
. - SendGrid API Client Configuration Improvement: I've refined the SendGrid HTTP client initialization in
AppDependencies
. The base API URL is now explicitly separated from the version path (/v3
), making the configuration more flexible and clearer for future adjustments.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request effectively refactors the environment variable handling by introducing a helper method to reduce duplication. The changes are clear and improve maintainability. The main feedback is to enhance the new helper method to retain the specific, context-rich error messages that were present before the refactoring, which is important for easier debugging.
Status
READY/IN DEVELOPMENT/HOLD
Description
Type of Change