Skip to content

Conversation

@SmallishBubbles
Copy link
Contributor

Description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why:
changed autoFocus to autofocus. Verified that autofocus is correct in https://docs.flutter.dev/cookbook/forms/focus

Issues fixed by this PR (if any):
Copy paste of tutorial code produces an error due to incorrect casing of the autofocus property.

PRs or commits this PR depends on (if any):

Presubmit checklist

  • If you are unwilling, or unable, to sign the CLA, even for a tiny, one-word PR, please file an issue instead of a PR.
  • If this PR is not meant to land until a future stable release, mark it as draft with an explanation.
  • This PR follows the Google Developer Documentation Style Guidelines—for example, it doesn't use i.e. or e.g., and it avoids I and we (first-person pronouns).
  • This PR uses semantic line breaks
    of 80 characters or fewer.

autoFocus is not correct, the property is all in lowercase. Verified in https://docs.flutter.dev/cookbook/forms/focus
@SmallishBubbles SmallishBubbles requested review from a team and sfshaza2 as code owners January 15, 2026 20:42
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @SmallishBubbles, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a minor yet impactful documentation error by standardizing the casing of the autofocus property across the user-input.md tutorial. By ensuring consistency with the official Flutter API, the changes prevent potential compilation errors for users who copy code snippets directly from the documentation, thereby improving the overall accuracy and usability of the learning material.

Highlights

  • Documentation Correction: Corrected the casing of the autofocus property from autoFocus to autofocus within the user-input.md tutorial.
  • Code Example Accuracy: Updated all instances of autoFocus: true to autofocus: true in the TextField code examples to reflect the correct property name.
  • Quiz Explanation Update: Modified a quiz explanation to use the correct autofocus casing when discussing its behavior.
  • Issue Resolution: This change resolves an issue where copying tutorial code with the incorrect casing would lead to errors.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly changes all instances of autoFocus to the correct autofocus property name within the user input tutorial. This is a valuable fix that ensures the sample code is correct for users following the tutorial. I've added one minor suggestion to improve the formatting consistency within the quiz section. Overall, this is a good contribution.

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@sfshaza2 sfshaza2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm. Thanks!

@sfshaza2
Copy link
Contributor

/gcbrun

2 similar comments
@sfshaza2
Copy link
Contributor

/gcbrun

@sfshaza2
Copy link
Contributor

/gcbrun

@parlough
Copy link
Member

/gcbrun

@flutter-website-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit bea8ee4):

https://flutter-docs-prod--pr12943-patch-1-t6ndplst.web.app

Copy link
Member

@parlough parlough left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for catching and fixing this!

@parlough parlough merged commit 03e84e3 into flutter:main Jan 16, 2026
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants