Replies: 3 comments
-
Do you mean stop scanning when the first VULNERABLE hit is found? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
yes, stop the scanning to save time when -q (quick scan) is provided ;) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
But maybe even better if it's configurable, something like |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
From using batch scanning toward thousands system controlled by saltstack server.
I found this feature is important, so that when a system has huge file system and contain many .jar files, log4j-finder to terminate the scan quickly without timeout. We can run another scan afterword if full list is needed.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions