Skip to content

Review possible approach for testing coverage #783

@tcompa

Description

@tcompa

This was explored in the past, with no satisfactory result - see #321.
We should review this, especially due to (1) potential updates in the ecosystem in the last 1.5 years, (2) potential differences coming from Svelte 5 (ref #782).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    testingTests, including both vitest (unit) and playwrigth

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Status

    TODO

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions