Skip to content

Adding support for D4J #26

@im-yun

Description

@im-yun
Since this client has been rewritten to be generic, it is possible to write custom implementations of the abstract Lavalink and Link classes.

The client was made generic with FredBoat in mind, but if you need generics for your own purposes, you can open an issue and I can elaborate on this brief documentation.

^
Would be nice if you can provide bit of insight on this I would like to use this with D4J.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions