Clarify wording in Java vs JavaScript class/object comparison

Signed-off-by: Tiisetso Dinoko <[email protected]>

Author: Dinokojt7

src/content/1/en/part1b.md

@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ const janja = new Person('Janja Garnbret', 23)
 janja.greet()
 ```
 
-When it comes to syntax, the classes and the objects created from them are very reminiscent of Java classes and objects. Their behavior is also quite similar to Java objects. At the core, they are still objects based on JavaScript's [prototypal inheritance](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/JavaScript/Objects/Inheritance). The type of both objects is actually _Object_, since JavaScript essentially only defines the types [Boolean, Null, Undefined, Number, String, Symbol, BigInt, and Object](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Data_structures).
+When it comes to syntax, JavaScript classes and the instances created from them are very reminiscent of how classes and objects work in Java. Their behavior is also quite similar to Java objects. At their core, however, they are still plain JavaScript objects built on [prototypal inheritance](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/JavaScript/Objects/Inheritance). The type of any such class instance is still _Object_, because JavaScript fundamentally defines only a limited set of types: [Boolean, Null, Undefined, Number, String, Symbol, BigInt, and Object](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Data_structures).
 
 The introduction of the class syntax was a controversial addition. Check out [Not Awesome: ES6 Classes](https://github.com/petsel/not-awesome-es6-classes) or [Is “Class” In ES6 The New “Bad” Part? on Medium](https://medium.com/@rajaraodv/is-class-in-es6-the-new-bad-part-6c4e6fe1ee65) for more details.