part 7 vite

Author: mluukkai

src/content/7/en/part7e.md

@@ -524,9 +524,7 @@ When it comes to the tools used for the management and bundling of JavaScript pr
 - 2012-14 [Browserify](https://www.npmjs.com/package/browserify)
 - 2015- [Webpack](https://www.npmjs.com/package/webpack)
 
-Hipsters seem to have lost their interest in tool development after webpack started to dominate the markets. A few years ago, [Parcel](https://parceljs.org) started to make the rounds marketing itself as simple (which Webpack is not) and faster than Webpack. However, after a promising start, Parcel has not gathered any steam, and it's beginning to look like it will not be the end of Webpack. Currently, [Vite](https://vitejs.dev) tools, also simpler than Webpack, are gaining popularity - but their success can only be measured in the future.
-
-Another notable mention is the [Rome](https://rome.tools/) library, which aspires to be an all-encompassing toolchain to unify linter, compiler, bundler, and more. It is currently under heavy development since the initial commit earlier this year on Feb 27, but the outlook sure seems promising.
+Hipsters seem to have lost their interest in tool development after webpack started to dominate the markets. A few years ago, [Parcel](https://parceljs.org) started to make the rounds marketing itself as simple (which Webpack is not) and faster than Webpack. However, after a promising start, Parcel has not gathered any steam, and it's beginning to look like it will not be the end of Webpack. Recently, [esbuild](https://esbuild.github.io/) has been on a relatively high rise and is already seriously challenging Webpack.
 
 The site <https://reactpatterns.com/> provides a concise list of best practices for React, some of which are already familiar from this course. Another similar list is [react bits](https://vasanthk.gitbooks.io/react-bits/).
 

src/content/7/fi/osa7e.md

@@ -519,9 +519,10 @@ JavaScript-projektien projektinhallintaan ja bundlaamiseen käytettyjen työkalu
 - 2012 [Grunt](https://www.npmjs.com/package/grunt)
 - 2013-14 [Gulp](https://www.npmjs.com/package/gulp)
 - 2012-14 [Browserify](https://www.npmjs.com/package/browserify)
-- 2015- [Webpack](https://www.npmjs.com/package/webpack)
+- 2015-2021 [Webpack](https://www.npmjs.com/package/webpack)
+- 2022- ?
 
-Hipsterien suurin into työkalukehitykseen näytti pysähtyneen webpackin vallattua markkinat. Pari vuotta sitten markkinoille ilmestyi uusi tulokas [Parcel](https://parceljs.org), joka markkinoi olevansa yksinkertainen, sitähän Webpack ei missään nimessä ole, ja paljon nopeampi kuin Webpack. Lupaavan alun jälkeen Parcel ei kuitenkaan ole jatkanut nostettaan, ja vaikuttaa että siitä ei kuitenkaan ole Webpackin tappajaksi.
+Hipsterien suurin into työkalukehitykseen näytti pysähtyneen Webpackin vallattua markkinat. Muutama vuosi sitten markkinoille ilmestyi uusi tulokas [Parcel](https://parceljs.org), joka markkinoi olevansa yksinkertainen, sitähän Webpack ei missään nimessä ole, ja paljon nopeampi kuin Webpack. Lupaavan alun jälkeen Parcel ei kuitenkaan ole jatkanut nostettaan, ja siitä ei ollut Webpackin tappajaksi. Viime aikoina [esbuild](https://esbuild.github.io/) on ollut suhteellisen kovassa nosteessa ja haastaa jo tosissaan Webpackia.
 
 Sivu <https://reactpatterns.com/> tarjoaa tiiviissä muodossa listan parhaita react-käytänteitä, joista osa on jo tältäkin kurssilta tuttuja. Toinen samankaltainen lista on [react bits](https://vasanthk.gitbooks.io/react-bits/).