testing(require-param): indicate absence of effect on destructuring

Author: brettz9

README.md

@@ -6377,6 +6377,27 @@ function quux (foo) {
 }
 // Settings: {"jsdoc":{"tagNamePreference":{"param":false}}}
 // Message: Unexpected tag `@param`
+
+/**
+ *
+ */
+function quux ({bar, baz}, foo) {
+}
+// Message: Missing JSDoc @param "foo" declaration.
+
+/**
+ *
+ */
+function quux (foo, {bar, baz}) {
+}
+// Message: Missing JSDoc @param "foo" declaration.
+
+/**
+ *
+ */
+function quux ([bar, baz], foo) {
+}
+// Message: Missing JSDoc @param "foo" declaration.
 ````
 
 The following patterns are not considered problems:

test/rules/assertions/requireParam.js

@@ -409,6 +409,69 @@ export default {
         },
       },
     },
+    {
+      code: `
+      /**
+       *
+       */
+      function quux ({bar, baz}, foo) {
+      }
+      `,
+      errors: [
+        {
+          message: 'Missing JSDoc @param "foo" declaration.',
+        },
+      ],
+      output: `
+      /**
+       * @param foo
+       */
+      function quux ({bar, baz}, foo) {
+      }
+      `,
+    },
+    {
+      code: `
+      /**
+       *
+       */
+      function quux (foo, {bar, baz}) {
+      }
+      `,
+      errors: [
+        {
+          message: 'Missing JSDoc @param "foo" declaration.',
+        },
+      ],
+      output: `
+      /**
+       * @param foo
+       */
+      function quux (foo, {bar, baz}) {
+      }
+      `,
+    },
+    {
+      code: `
+      /**
+       *
+       */
+      function quux ([bar, baz], foo) {
+      }
+      `,
+      errors: [
+        {
+          message: 'Missing JSDoc @param "foo" declaration.',
+        },
+      ],
+      output: `
+      /**
+       * @param foo
+       */
+      function quux ([bar, baz], foo) {
+      }
+      `,
+    },
   ],
   valid: [
     {