Open
Conversation
added 2 commits
January 12, 2026 10:31
inequality direction was wrong as well
correctly index both sides of assignment
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull requests fixes what I believe are mistakes that generate incorrect density and cdf values due to not properly indexing both sides of an assignment.
For example, in the line:
if
sigmais a vector and only some values are below 0.0001 the number of items on the left is not the same as on the right, causing a length mismatch, a warning, and incorrect density values inserted.This issue was identified and fixed in BB, DELAPORT, GeneralisedPoisson (where the inequality was actually in the wrong direction as well!), NBF, NBI and NBII.