You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Partecipants are asked to fill in discussion points beforehand. The results of these discussions (decisions, suggestions, comments, ..) are reported as the sub items.
22
+
Participants were asked to fill in discussion points beforehand. The results of these discussions (decisions, suggestions, comments, etc.) are reported as subitems.
23
23
24
24
Discussion points marked \* were not brought up due to lack of time.
25
25
@@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ Anyone can reach out in `#meta` on the Discord server to comment/discuss on any
30
30
- avivace:
31
31
32
32
- Q to ISSO: RGBDS Rust port plans?
33
-
- Scope: Full port from the old codebase, can’t be 1to1
33
+
- Scope: Full port from the old codebase, can’t be 1-to-1
34
34
- Architecture design in progress
35
35
- Motivation: C not attractive anymore for potential contributors. Showing its age. Technicalities (std::vector). Rust is fancier, more active community.
36
36
- (Personal) De-risking/Viability study
37
37
- Question from Pino: will this affect availability of binaries?
38
38
- Homebrew Hub: developments and expanding to NES \*
39
-
- Gbcompo23: [...]\*
39
+
- Gbcompo23: \[...\]\*
40
40
- Funding: how to? \*
41
41
- Creating the steering committee: Roles? \*
42
42
- Q to Sanqui: how to run these meetings? Minutes \*
@@ -69,23 +69,23 @@ Anyone can reach out in `#meta` on the Discord server to comment/discuss on any
69
69
70
70
- nitro2k01:
71
71
72
-
- Potentially add long a term solution for the IRC bridge as a point/responsibility.
72
+
- Potentially add a long-term solution for the IRC bridge as a point/responsibility.
73
73
- Someone other than @avivace needs to volunteer (=> @nitro2k01) and get SSH access and/or a webhook token to delegate the responsibility of handling the bridge
74
74
- Future of the forums \*
75
75
76
76
- Kva64:
77
77
78
-
-social media handling — general outline and feedback request
78
+
-Social media handling — general outline and feedback request
79
79
- Not only game releases/showcase content can be shared, but projects themselves may have cool milestones to share
80
-
- Allow developers, maintainers… to raise up things that can be promoted, so people helping with social media don’t have to “chase” those. Should those go in #showcase? Should #showcase be split?
80
+
- Allow developers, maintainers, etc. to raise up things that can be promoted, so people helping with social media don’t have to “chase” those. Should those go in #showcase? Should #showcase be split?
81
81
- Encourage (PSA?) developers to post in #showcase
82
82
Move all showcase channels to a separate category, and rename “showcase” to “wip-showcase”?
83
83
Split #releases into e.g. #releases-games and #releases-tooling
84
84
- To discuss in #meta: opt-in/opt-out status of showcase channels. A suggestion: make sharing opt-out in #releases-\*, and opt-in in #wip-showcase
85
-
-policy on sharing and promoting commercial projects?
86
-
- DUO: do not shy away from promoting them because it’s a motivation to some; however, restrictions should be put to avoid being taken advantage of
87
-
- Should the cooldown (if any) should apply per project, per user, ..?
88
-
-need for using any newlyemerging social media platforms (e.g threads and bluesky)?
85
+
-Policy on sharing and promoting commercial projects?
86
+
- DUO: do not shy away from promoting them because it’s a motivation to some; however, restrictions should be put to avoid being taken advantage of
87
+
- Should the cooldown (if any) apply per project, per user...?
88
+
-Need for using any newly-emerging social media platforms (e.g. Threads and Bluesky)?
89
89
- Threads and Bluesky currently have very little reach, so maybe not
90
90
- Other platforms (e.g. Instagram): maybe, but this may require more people to handle them
0 commit comments